<p>Deep learning has been extensively applied to medical imaging tasks over the past years, achieving outstanding results. However, the obscure reasoning of the models and the lack of supportive evidence causes both clinicians and patients to distrust the models’ predictions, hindering their adoption in clinical practice. In recent years, the research community has focused on developing explanations capable of revealing a model’s reasoning. Among various types of explanations, example-based explanations emerged as particularly intuitive for medical practitioners. Despite the intuitiveness and wide development of example-based explanations, no work provides a comprehensive review of existing example-based explainability works in the medical image domain. In this work, we review works that provide example-based explanations for medical imaging tasks, reflecting on their strengths and limitations. We identify the absence of objective evaluation metrics, the lack of clinical validation and privacy concerns as the main issues that hinder the deployment of example-based explanations in clinical practice. Finally, we reflect on future directions contributing towards the deployment of example-based explainability in clinical practice.</p>