Adherence to digital health interventions remains a persistent challenge, limiting their effectiveness and motivating the need for scalable strategies that promote sustained engagement. This randomized controlled trial investigated whether user adherence could be enhanced by two specific persuasive design strategies: a gamification approach focused on visualizing skill progression, and a social support approach based on automated interaction between supportive partners. University students were recruited and assigned to a control, gamification, or social support group. The control group received the standard intervention without persuasive strategies, whereas the gamification group utilized skill-based progression systems and infographics. In the social support group, participants were paired into teams. Participants were encouraged to motivate teammates to complete daily diary entries, with mutual completion triggering a congratulatory email. Average module completions were: control (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\varvec{M = 2.52}$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mi> <mo mathvariant="bold">=</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">2.52</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, SD = 1.92), gamification (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\varvec{M = 2.69}$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mi> <mo mathvariant="bold">=</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">2.69</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, SD = 1.89), and social support (<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$\varvec{M = 2.76}$</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="bold-italic">M</mi> <mo mathvariant="bold">=</mo> <mn mathvariant="bold">2.76</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, SD = 2.03). Neither the gamification components nor the automated peer support system improved adherence compared to the control. Although the peer support strategy in the social support group recorded more diary entries, this did not translate to improved module adherence. User experience ratings were comparable in all groups, indicating that the strategies did not affect usability. The smaller-than-planned sample size and higher attrition rates warrant cautious interpretation of these findings. These results contribute to healthcare informatics by demonstrating the limitations of generic persuasive strategies and highlighting the need for more adaptive, context-aware engagement mechanisms in digital interventions.

Persuasive Design in a Digital Mindfulness Intervention: A Randomized Trial of a Skill-Based Achievement System and Automated Peer Encouragement

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2025年10月29日

查看全文

Abdul Rahman Idrees,
Robin Kraft,
Ann-Marie Küchler,
Leandra Bantleon,
Harald Baumeister,
Manfred Reichert,
Fanny Kählke,
David Daniel Ebert,
Rüdiger Pryss

摘要

Adherence to digital health interventions remains a persistent challenge, limiting their effectiveness and motivating the need for scalable strategies that promote sustained engagement. This randomized controlled trial investigated whether user adherence could be enhanced by two specific persuasive design strategies: a gamification approach focused on visualizing skill progression, and a social support approach based on automated interaction between supportive partners. University students were recruited and assigned to a control, gamification, or social support group. The control group received the standard intervention without persuasive strategies, whereas the gamification group utilized skill-based progression systems and infographics. In the social support group, participants were paired into teams. Participants were encouraged to motivate teammates to complete daily diary entries, with mutual completion triggering a congratulatory email. Average module completions were: control ( $\varvec{M = 2.52}$ $M = 2.52$ , SD = 1.92), gamification ( $\varvec{M = 2.69}$ $M = 2.69$ , SD = 1.89), and social support ( $\varvec{M = 2.76}$ $M = 2.76$ , SD = 2.03). Neither the gamification components nor the automated peer support system improved adherence compared to the control. Although the peer support strategy in the social support group recorded more diary entries, this did not translate to improved module adherence. User experience ratings were comparable in all groups, indicating that the strategies did not affect usability. The smaller-than-planned sample size and higher attrition rates warrant cautious interpretation of these findings. These results contribute to healthcare informatics by demonstrating the limitations of generic persuasive strategies and highlighting the need for more adaptive, context-aware engagement mechanisms in digital interventions.