Scholarlink

<p>The peer-review process is vital for maintaining scientific quality, relying heavily on human judgment and expertise. Recently, publishers have started using artificial intelligence to help handle increasing manuscript submissions. While artificial intelligence efficiently identifies plagiarism and formatting issues, it lacks the critical perspective and ethical insight unique to human reviewers. Excessive reliance on artificial intelligence may reinforce biases, limit transparency, and reduce meaningful guidance for researchers. It is crucial to retain human-led peer review, ensuring that expert judgment continues to guide scientific publishing, promote fairness, encourage innovation, and preserve the essential mentoring role reviewers provide, particularly for early-career scientists.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Beyond Automation: Why Human Expertise Remains Essential in Scientific Peer Review

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年6月20日

查看全文
  • César Ramírez-Márquez,
  • José María Ponce-Ortega

摘要

The peer-review process is vital for maintaining scientific quality, relying heavily on human judgment and expertise. Recently, publishers have started using artificial intelligence to help handle increasing manuscript submissions. While artificial intelligence efficiently identifies plagiarism and formatting issues, it lacks the critical perspective and ethical insight unique to human reviewers. Excessive reliance on artificial intelligence may reinforce biases, limit transparency, and reduce meaningful guidance for researchers. It is crucial to retain human-led peer review, ensuring that expert judgment continues to guide scientific publishing, promote fairness, encourage innovation, and preserve the essential mentoring role reviewers provide, particularly for early-career scientists.