<p>To overcome the difficulty and high cost of some specific isotopic targets, a substitution method was proposed to measure the cross section of the (<InlineEquation ID="IEq13"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, n) reactions. Considering that the natural copper element (<InlineEquation ID="IEq14"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^\text {nat}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mtext>nat</mtext> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cu) only has <InlineEquation ID="IEq15"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{63}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>63</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cu and <InlineEquation ID="IEq16"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{65}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>65</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cu isotopes, the <InlineEquation ID="IEq17"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{65}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>65</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cu(<InlineEquation ID="IEq18"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, n)<InlineEquation ID="IEq19"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{64}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>64</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cu reaction was taken as an example to test the substitution method. Using quasi-monoenergetic <InlineEquation ID="IEq20"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> beams provided by the Shanghai Laser Electron Gamma Source (SLEGS) of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF), <InlineEquation ID="IEq21"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^\text {nat}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mtext>nat</mtext> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cu(<InlineEquation ID="IEq22"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, n) was measured from <InlineEquation ID="IEq23"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(E_\gamma =\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msub> <mi>E</mi> <mi>γ</mi> </msub> <mo>=</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> 11.09 MeV to 17.87 MeV. Furthermore, based on the <InlineEquation ID="IEq24"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{63}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>63</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cu(<InlineEquation ID="IEq25"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, n) reaction measured using the same experimental setup at SLEGS, <InlineEquation ID="IEq26"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{65}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>65</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cu(<InlineEquation ID="IEq27"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, n)<InlineEquation ID="IEq28"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{64}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>64</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cu was extracted using the substitution method. The abundance variation of natural copper, showing a significant influence on the cross section, was also investigated. The results were compared to the existing experimental data measured by bremsstrahlung and positron annihilation in-flight sources, and the TALYS 2.0 predictions. The <InlineEquation ID="IEq29"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> strength function (<InlineEquation ID="IEq30"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>SF) of <InlineEquation ID="IEq31"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{65}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>65</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cu was obtained from the <InlineEquation ID="IEq32"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{65}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>65</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cu(<InlineEquation ID="IEq33"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, n) data, and the reaction cross section of <InlineEquation ID="IEq34"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^{64}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mn>64</mn> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>Cu(n, <InlineEquation ID="IEq35"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>γ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) was further calculated.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A substitution measurement for cross section of \(^{65}\)Cu(\(\gamma\), n)\(^{64}\)Cu reaction using \(^\text {nat}\)Cu and \(^{63}\)Cu targets by quasi-monoenergetic \(\gamma\) beams at SLEGS

  • Pu Jiao,
  • Zi-Rui Hao,
  • Zhi-Cai Li,
  • Qian-Kun Sun,
  • Long-Xiang Liu,
  • Hang-Hua Xu,
  • Yue Zhang,
  • Meng-Die Zhou,
  • Wen Luo,
  • Yu-Xuan Yang,
  • Sheng Jin,
  • Kai-Jie Chen,
  • Shan Ye,
  • Zhen-Wei Wang,
  • Yu-Ting Wang,
  • Hui-Ling Wei,
  • Yao Fu,
  • Kun Yu,
  • Hong-Wei Wang,
  • Gong-Tao Fan,
  • Chun-Wang Ma

摘要

To overcome the difficulty and high cost of some specific isotopic targets, a substitution method was proposed to measure the cross section of the ( \(\gamma\) γ , n) reactions. Considering that the natural copper element ( \(^\text {nat}\) nat Cu) only has \(^{63}\) 63 Cu and \(^{65}\) 65 Cu isotopes, the \(^{65}\) 65 Cu( \(\gamma\) γ , n) \(^{64}\) 64 Cu reaction was taken as an example to test the substitution method. Using quasi-monoenergetic \(\gamma\) γ beams provided by the Shanghai Laser Electron Gamma Source (SLEGS) of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF), \(^\text {nat}\) nat Cu( \(\gamma\) γ , n) was measured from \(E_\gamma =\) E γ = 11.09 MeV to 17.87 MeV. Furthermore, based on the \(^{63}\) 63 Cu( \(\gamma\) γ , n) reaction measured using the same experimental setup at SLEGS, \(^{65}\) 65 Cu( \(\gamma\) γ , n) \(^{64}\) 64 Cu was extracted using the substitution method. The abundance variation of natural copper, showing a significant influence on the cross section, was also investigated. The results were compared to the existing experimental data measured by bremsstrahlung and positron annihilation in-flight sources, and the TALYS 2.0 predictions. The \(\gamma\) γ strength function ( \(\gamma\) γ SF) of \(^{65}\) 65 Cu was obtained from the \(^{65}\) 65 Cu( \(\gamma\) γ , n) data, and the reaction cross section of \(^{64}\) 64 Cu(n, \(\gamma\) γ ) was further calculated.