Scholarlink

<p>Greenhouse screenings evaluated soybean cultivars for genetic resistance to <i>Meloidogyne incognita</i>. For verification, cultivars identified with resistance were subjected to enzymatic assays, viz. lipoxygenase (LOX) and guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), as well as histopathological evaluations. Reproduction factor values were used as the main criterium to identify <i>M. incognita</i> resistance levels; it showed that cultivar LS 5995 and genotype GCI 7 contained the highest resistance levels while cultivars LS 6248 R and Dundee were highly susceptible. Significant differences in GPX levels in leaves and roots of inoculated GCI 7 plants versus uninoculated plants verified <i>M. incognita</i> resistance in this cultivar, while the same trend was only evident for GPX analyses from leaves of the resistant standard LS 5995. For LOX, the resistance trait was verified in roots of GCI 7 and LS 5995 48&#xa0;h after J2 inoculation and in Egret 24&#xa0;h after J2 inoculation. Histopathology evaluations confirmed the presence of resistance in both GCI 7 and LS 5995, attributed to the formation giant cells that were distinctly different from those observed in vascular cylinders of susceptible cultivars. Cultivar Egret, previously identified as resistant, showed susceptibility based on greenhouse screenings and histopathology investigations, but not according to LOX analysis. Greenhouse screenings proved to be an accurate strategy to identify resistance in local soybean cultivars, enzyme analyses confirming host status traits warrant further investigations to optimise such an approach. Histopathological studies ultimately indicated the mechanism of resistance at the cellular level, showing the presence of hypersensitivity as an additional resistance mechanism except for antibiosis.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Confirmation of resistance in different soybean cultivars to Meloidogyne incognita using greenhouse screenings, enzymes and histopathology approaches

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月12日

查看全文
  • Milad Rashidifard,
  • Jacques Berner,
  • Hendrika Fourie

摘要

Greenhouse screenings evaluated soybean cultivars for genetic resistance to Meloidogyne incognita. For verification, cultivars identified with resistance were subjected to enzymatic assays, viz. lipoxygenase (LOX) and guaiacol peroxidase (GPX), as well as histopathological evaluations. Reproduction factor values were used as the main criterium to identify M. incognita resistance levels; it showed that cultivar LS 5995 and genotype GCI 7 contained the highest resistance levels while cultivars LS 6248 R and Dundee were highly susceptible. Significant differences in GPX levels in leaves and roots of inoculated GCI 7 plants versus uninoculated plants verified M. incognita resistance in this cultivar, while the same trend was only evident for GPX analyses from leaves of the resistant standard LS 5995. For LOX, the resistance trait was verified in roots of GCI 7 and LS 5995 48 h after J2 inoculation and in Egret 24 h after J2 inoculation. Histopathology evaluations confirmed the presence of resistance in both GCI 7 and LS 5995, attributed to the formation giant cells that were distinctly different from those observed in vascular cylinders of susceptible cultivars. Cultivar Egret, previously identified as resistant, showed susceptibility based on greenhouse screenings and histopathology investigations, but not according to LOX analysis. Greenhouse screenings proved to be an accurate strategy to identify resistance in local soybean cultivars, enzyme analyses confirming host status traits warrant further investigations to optimise such an approach. Histopathological studies ultimately indicated the mechanism of resistance at the cellular level, showing the presence of hypersensitivity as an additional resistance mechanism except for antibiosis.