Scholarlink

<p>Local governments play a critical role in translating global climate goals into urban action. This study conducts a comparative analysis of climate change governance in Mersin (Turkey) and Tromsø (Norway), representing contrasting Mediterranean and Sub-Arctic urban contexts. Utilizing a qualitative content analysis of Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plans (SECAPs), Strategic Plans, and 2024 Annual Activity Reports, the research evaluates the transition from policy discourse to operational implementation. The findings reveal that while both cities have institutionalized climate governance, their implementation trajectories diverge significantly. Tromsø demonstrates a mature integration of climate objectives into its fiscal framework through a “Climate Budget,” achieving a 3.5% annual reduction in emissions and 43% fleet electrification. In contrast, Mersin is in an intensive institutionalization phase, focusing on Mediterranean-specific risks like water security and disaster preparedness through its Climate Change and Zero Waste Department. The results suggest that while document-level commitments are strong in both cases, the effectiveness of implementation is contingent upon fiscal mainstreaming and monitoring mechanisms. This research provides local policymakers with evidence-based information and recommendations on how to increase urban resilience and reduce the ‘planning-action gap’ by aligning strategic climate goals with municipal budget practices.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

From the Mediterranean to the Arctic: the climate change approaches of Mersin and Tromsø municipalities

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月12日

查看全文
  • Simge Dağıdır

摘要

Local governments play a critical role in translating global climate goals into urban action. This study conducts a comparative analysis of climate change governance in Mersin (Turkey) and Tromsø (Norway), representing contrasting Mediterranean and Sub-Arctic urban contexts. Utilizing a qualitative content analysis of Sustainable Energy and Climate Action Plans (SECAPs), Strategic Plans, and 2024 Annual Activity Reports, the research evaluates the transition from policy discourse to operational implementation. The findings reveal that while both cities have institutionalized climate governance, their implementation trajectories diverge significantly. Tromsø demonstrates a mature integration of climate objectives into its fiscal framework through a “Climate Budget,” achieving a 3.5% annual reduction in emissions and 43% fleet electrification. In contrast, Mersin is in an intensive institutionalization phase, focusing on Mediterranean-specific risks like water security and disaster preparedness through its Climate Change and Zero Waste Department. The results suggest that while document-level commitments are strong in both cases, the effectiveness of implementation is contingent upon fiscal mainstreaming and monitoring mechanisms. This research provides local policymakers with evidence-based information and recommendations on how to increase urban resilience and reduce the ‘planning-action gap’ by aligning strategic climate goals with municipal budget practices.