Enhancing Sustainability in Masonry Construction: A Comparative Study of Rat Trap Bond (RTB) Fly Ash (FA) Bricks vs. English Bond Brickwork
摘要
This study addresses the urgent need for sustainable alternatives by comparing Rat-Trap Bond (RTB) masonry constructed with Fly Ash (FA) bricks against traditional English bond clay brickwork. A three-phase experimental program was undertaken: (1) characterization of material properties (water absorption, compressive strength, and bond strength) of FA bricks and cement mortar; (2) evaluation of mechanical performance through prism testing (compressive, diagonal shear, and triplet tests) following ASTM and EN standards; and (3) in-plane quasi-static cyclic loading of masonry walls to assess lateral strength, ductility, stiffness degradation, and energy dissipation. Results reveal that RTB FA brick prisms exhibit an average compressive strength of 3.6 MPa and a modulus of elasticity of 1.20 GPa, while shear tests yielded a cohesion of 0.09 MPa and friction coefficient of 0.43. Quasi-static in-plane testing of Rat Trap Bond (RTB) fly ash brick masonry walls showed a sufficient elastic stiffness (15.95 kN/mm) and moderate ductility (mean ratio 4.41), as well as stable energy dissipation mechanisms. Seismic performance parameters such as stiffness, strength, and ductility were assessed using a bilinear idealization of the average envelope curve derived from the equal energy principle, backing the possible appropriateness of RTB masonry in areas vulnerable to earthquakes. A bilinear idealization of the envelope curve verifies the applicability of RTB masonry in seismic-prone regions. Economic and environmental analyses indicate an 88% reduction in carbon emissions and a 25% cost saving per cubic meter of wall. These findings substantiate RTB FA brick masonry as a viable, eco-efficient construction technique.