<p>Timely emergency department (ED) access is vital for young children under five (U-5) years and adults aged <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\ge \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>85 years. This study assessed the spatial equity of populations at higher risk of delayed emergency care across Greater Melbourne to identify priority areas for intervention. We integrated 2021 mesh-block demographics with the geolocations of 39 public and private EDs. Using Voronoi tessellation, we defined service catchments and employed 15&#xa0; km straight-line buffers as proxies for a 15-minute ambulance response range. Of 386,663 children U-5 and adults <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\ge \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>85 across 46,608 populated mesh blocks, 92.9% lived within 15&#xa0;km of an ED, while 27,475 (7.1%) individuals lived outside this effective reach. Underserved residents cluster in three peri-urban corridors: Sunbury–Diggers Rest, Little River–Werribee South, and Whittlesea–Kinglake. Five hospitals account for 35% of the groups with elevated emergency healthcare needs caseload. Low-income areas show <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sim \)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>50% higher odds of being outside the 15&#xa0; km threshold (9.1% vs 6.0%). Geographic isolation, age-related vulnerability, and socioeconomic disadvantage converge to form critical service gaps. Targeted investments in emergency infrastructure, community paramedicine, and equity-focused urban planning are warranted to ensure prompt, life-saving care for Melbourne’s most at-risk populations.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Spatial Disparities in Emergency Service Accessibility for Vulnerable Populations in Melbourne: A Voronoi Tessellation Study

  • Mohammad Afzal Khan,
  • Oyelola Adegboye,
  • Shiyang Lyu,
  • Kiki Maulana Adhinugraha,
  • Theophilus I. Emeto,
  • David Taniar

摘要

Timely emergency department (ED) access is vital for young children under five (U-5) years and adults aged \(\ge \) 85 years. This study assessed the spatial equity of populations at higher risk of delayed emergency care across Greater Melbourne to identify priority areas for intervention. We integrated 2021 mesh-block demographics with the geolocations of 39 public and private EDs. Using Voronoi tessellation, we defined service catchments and employed 15  km straight-line buffers as proxies for a 15-minute ambulance response range. Of 386,663 children U-5 and adults \(\ge \) 85 across 46,608 populated mesh blocks, 92.9% lived within 15 km of an ED, while 27,475 (7.1%) individuals lived outside this effective reach. Underserved residents cluster in three peri-urban corridors: Sunbury–Diggers Rest, Little River–Werribee South, and Whittlesea–Kinglake. Five hospitals account for 35% of the groups with elevated emergency healthcare needs caseload. Low-income areas show \(\sim \) 50% higher odds of being outside the 15  km threshold (9.1% vs 6.0%). Geographic isolation, age-related vulnerability, and socioeconomic disadvantage converge to form critical service gaps. Targeted investments in emergency infrastructure, community paramedicine, and equity-focused urban planning are warranted to ensure prompt, life-saving care for Melbourne’s most at-risk populations.