Scholarlink

<p>Indian philosophy unlike western philosophy has developed through <i>darśana</i>s which are known as systems or schools. Almost each system has grown through a source text, commentaries and sub-commentaries. The source texts are in the <i>sūtra</i> form or sometimes in <i>kārikā</i> form. Almost each system of Indian philosophy has three components—epistemology, ontology and axiology—the perspectives on <i>pramāṇa</i>, <i>prameya</i> and <i>puruṣārtha</i>. Sachchidanand Mishra’s Sanskrit work in Kārikā form along with its auto-commentary is a step towards fulfilling the need of a classical text which presents Cārvāka perspective in its sophisticated and strong form. </p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Book Review: Philosophical Position of a Modern Cārvāka

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年8月1日

查看全文
  • Pradeep Gokhale

摘要

Indian philosophy unlike western philosophy has developed through darśanas which are known as systems or schools. Almost each system has grown through a source text, commentaries and sub-commentaries. The source texts are in the sūtra form or sometimes in kārikā form. Almost each system of Indian philosophy has three components—epistemology, ontology and axiology—the perspectives on pramāṇa, prameya and puruṣārtha. Sachchidanand Mishra’s Sanskrit work in Kārikā form along with its auto-commentary is a step towards fulfilling the need of a classical text which presents Cārvāka perspective in its sophisticated and strong form.