Scholarlink

<p>Friendship holds significance in human interaction not just as a relation to be sociologically noted; rather as a component of ethical life, to be philosophically studied. In Derrida, we witness a newfound deliberation on the theme of friendship which educates us of the possibility of friendship going <i>beyond</i> the canonical figure of friendship. Friendship in Derrida is thus experienced as a changed relation, unlike Aristotelian stable <i>(bèbaios)</i> friendships where ‘presence’ and ‘proximity’ are a must. Friendship as a canonical narrative in philosophy is infused with biases and difficulties, and Derridean deconstruction by exposing these offers an ethical potential in friendship that is marked by <i>undecidability</i>. Derrida’s analysis is not dismissal of existing friendship; instead, it points at a revival of friendship, however, placed <i>at a distance</i>, meaning by death of a dear friend or by the <i>impossible-possibility</i> of the concept, both pertaining to the absolute alterity of <i>the other</i>. Derrida’s analysis presents to us the potential aspects of friendship in notions like ‘mourning’ or ‘singularity’ (uniqueness) of the friend, found within the narrative, but often unexplored. Derridean deconstruction explores these marginal issues that get suspended in the ‘unified’ discourse of grand narrative. For clarity, this study is divided into three sections. The first part examines the ethics and politics behind the saying ‘O my friends, there is no friend’ whose anonymity has not prevented its usage by several philosophers like Aristotle, Montaigne, Nietzsche, and so on. The second part analyses the inherent issues, inconsistencies and phallogocentric biases in the narrative of friendship. The third part draws on friendship and its novel ethical potential, through Derrida’s expansion of its supposed limits, giving us a friendship surviving at a distance, meaning a friendship of the <i>beyond</i> through his friendship <i>of the future</i> (not necessarily a temporality), a friendship <i>to come</i>.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Deconstructing Friendship: Ethical Engagements in Derrida

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月18日

查看全文
  • Tanya Yadav

摘要

Friendship holds significance in human interaction not just as a relation to be sociologically noted; rather as a component of ethical life, to be philosophically studied. In Derrida, we witness a newfound deliberation on the theme of friendship which educates us of the possibility of friendship going beyond the canonical figure of friendship. Friendship in Derrida is thus experienced as a changed relation, unlike Aristotelian stable (bèbaios) friendships where ‘presence’ and ‘proximity’ are a must. Friendship as a canonical narrative in philosophy is infused with biases and difficulties, and Derridean deconstruction by exposing these offers an ethical potential in friendship that is marked by undecidability. Derrida’s analysis is not dismissal of existing friendship; instead, it points at a revival of friendship, however, placed at a distance, meaning by death of a dear friend or by the impossible-possibility of the concept, both pertaining to the absolute alterity of the other. Derrida’s analysis presents to us the potential aspects of friendship in notions like ‘mourning’ or ‘singularity’ (uniqueness) of the friend, found within the narrative, but often unexplored. Derridean deconstruction explores these marginal issues that get suspended in the ‘unified’ discourse of grand narrative. For clarity, this study is divided into three sections. The first part examines the ethics and politics behind the saying ‘O my friends, there is no friend’ whose anonymity has not prevented its usage by several philosophers like Aristotle, Montaigne, Nietzsche, and so on. The second part analyses the inherent issues, inconsistencies and phallogocentric biases in the narrative of friendship. The third part draws on friendship and its novel ethical potential, through Derrida’s expansion of its supposed limits, giving us a friendship surviving at a distance, meaning a friendship of the beyond through his friendship of the future (not necessarily a temporality), a friendship to come.