<p>A modular form on an even lattice <i>M</i> of signature (<i>l</i>,&#xa0;2) is called reflective if it vanishes only on quadratic divisors orthogonal to the roots of <i>M</i>. We show that every reflective modular form on a lattice of type <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40879_2025_845_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="15" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="53" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(2U\hspace{1.111pt}{\oplus }\hspace{1.111pt}L\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>U</mi> <mspace width="1.111pt" /> <mo>⊕</mo> <mspace width="1.111pt" /> <mi>L</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> induces a root system that satisfies certain constraints. As applications, (1) we prove that there is no lattice of signature (21,&#xa0;2) with a reflective modular form and that <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40879_2025_845_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="64" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(2U\hspace{1.111pt}{\oplus }\hspace{1.111pt}D_{20}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mi>U</mi> <mspace width="1.111pt" /> <mo>⊕</mo> <mspace width="1.111pt" /> <msub> <mi>D</mi> <mn>20</mn> </msub> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> is the unique lattice of signature (22,&#xa0;2) and type <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40879_2025_845_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="15" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="48" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(U\hspace{1.111pt}{\oplus }\hspace{1.111pt}K\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>U</mi> <mspace width="1.111pt" /> <mo>⊕</mo> <mspace width="1.111pt" /> <mi>K</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> that has a reflective Borcherds product; (2) we give an automorphic proof of the theorem of Shvartsman and Vinberg, asserting that the algebra of modular forms for an arithmetic subgroup of <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40879_2025_845_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="47" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\textrm{O}(l,2)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mtext>O</mtext> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>l</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mn>2</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> can never be generated freely when <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40879_2025_845_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="16" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="46" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(l\geqslant 11\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>l</mi> <mo>⩾</mo> <mn>11</mn> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We also prove several results on the finiteness of lattices with reflective modular forms, and give an explicit example of hyperbolic reflection groups not coming from reflective modular forms.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

On the classification of reflective modular forms

  • Haowu Wang

摘要

A modular form on an even lattice M of signature (l, 2) is called reflective if it vanishes only on quadratic divisors orthogonal to the roots of M. We show that every reflective modular form on a lattice of type \(2U\hspace{1.111pt}{\oplus }\hspace{1.111pt}L\) 2 U L induces a root system that satisfies certain constraints. As applications, (1) we prove that there is no lattice of signature (21, 2) with a reflective modular form and that \(2U\hspace{1.111pt}{\oplus }\hspace{1.111pt}D_{20}\) 2 U D 20 is the unique lattice of signature (22, 2) and type \(U\hspace{1.111pt}{\oplus }\hspace{1.111pt}K\) U K that has a reflective Borcherds product; (2) we give an automorphic proof of the theorem of Shvartsman and Vinberg, asserting that the algebra of modular forms for an arithmetic subgroup of \(\textrm{O}(l,2)\) O ( l , 2 ) can never be generated freely when \(l\geqslant 11\) l 11 . We also prove several results on the finiteness of lattices with reflective modular forms, and give an explicit example of hyperbolic reflection groups not coming from reflective modular forms.