<p>Maize white spot (MWS) is an important disease of maize in Brazil. This study examined the relationship between MWS severity and yield using Fisher's Z (<i>Z</i>) and the correlation coefficient (<i>r</i>). Meta-analytic and random-coefficients models were fitted to yield–disease data to estimate the regression intercept (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\widehat{\beta }}_{0}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>β</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) and slope (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\widehat{\beta }}_{1}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>β</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). The effects of moderator variables (yield class, severity class, and region) were also assessed in the random-coefficients model. Economic damage thresholds (EDTs) were then determined through simulation. A significant association was observed between white spot severity and maize yield (<i>Z</i> = 0.51; <i>r</i> = − 0.47), with both models indicating a negative relationship. In the meta-analytic model, <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\widehat{\beta }}_{0}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>β</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mn>0</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\({\widehat{\beta }}_{1}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <msub> <mover accent="true"> <mi>β</mi> <mo stretchy="false">^</mo> </mover> <mn>1</mn> </msub> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> were estimated at 7,616.61&#xa0;kg/ha and − 60.22, respectively; in the random-coefficients model, they were 7,555.61&#xa0;kg/ha and − 57.53. No moderator significantly affected the slope (<i>P</i> &gt; 0.06), but yield class had a significant effect on the intercept (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.01). The MWS damage coefficient was − 0.80% (95% CI: − 1.06 to − 0.55), and the mean EDT was 2.1% disease severity. These findings confirm MWS as a limiting factor for maize yield and provide a quantitative basis for optimizing disease management strategies.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Modeling the severity–yield relationship and economic damage threshold of white spot epidemics in maize

  • Ana Carolyne Costa de Carvalho,
  • Karla Braga,
  • Adriano A. P. Custódio,
  • Marcelo G. Canteri,
  • Lucas H. Fantin,
  • Carlos M. Utiamada,
  • Hércules D. Campos,
  • Dagma D. Silva-Araújo,
  • Rodrigo V. Costa,
  • Aildson P. Duarte,
  • Alexandre A. Costa,
  • Aline G. Carvalho,
  • Ana C. Mochko,
  • André L. Silva,
  • Dionathan W. Lujan,
  • Fernanda C. L. Medeiros,
  • Fernanda C. Juliatti,
  • Fernando C. Juliatti,
  • Gisèle M. Fantin,
  • João M. T. Roy,
  • José F. J. Grigolli,
  • José Nunes-Júnior,
  • Marina Senger,
  • Nédio R. Tormen,
  • Emerson M. Del Ponte

摘要

Maize white spot (MWS) is an important disease of maize in Brazil. This study examined the relationship between MWS severity and yield using Fisher's Z (Z) and the correlation coefficient (r). Meta-analytic and random-coefficients models were fitted to yield–disease data to estimate the regression intercept ( \({\widehat{\beta }}_{0}\) β ^ 0 ) and slope ( \({\widehat{\beta }}_{1}\) β ^ 1 ). The effects of moderator variables (yield class, severity class, and region) were also assessed in the random-coefficients model. Economic damage thresholds (EDTs) were then determined through simulation. A significant association was observed between white spot severity and maize yield (Z = 0.51; r = − 0.47), with both models indicating a negative relationship. In the meta-analytic model, \({\widehat{\beta }}_{0}\) β ^ 0 and \({\widehat{\beta }}_{1}\) β ^ 1 were estimated at 7,616.61 kg/ha and − 60.22, respectively; in the random-coefficients model, they were 7,555.61 kg/ha and − 57.53. No moderator significantly affected the slope (P > 0.06), but yield class had a significant effect on the intercept (P < 0.01). The MWS damage coefficient was − 0.80% (95% CI: − 1.06 to − 0.55), and the mean EDT was 2.1% disease severity. These findings confirm MWS as a limiting factor for maize yield and provide a quantitative basis for optimizing disease management strategies.