<p>This paper examines the <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(L^p(\mathbb {R}^n)\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <msup> <mi>L</mi> <mi>p</mi> </msup> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <msup> <mrow> <mi mathvariant="double-struck">R</mi> </mrow> <mi>n</mi> </msup> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> boundedness of the <i>k</i>-th order commutator of parabolic singular integrals. When the kernel function <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Omega \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> satisfies the condition <Equation ID="Equ34"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} \sup \limits _{\xi \in S^{n-1}}\int _{S^{n-1}}|\Omega (y) |\left( \log \frac{1}{|\langle \xi ,y\rangle |}\right) ^{1+\gamma }d\sigma (y)&lt;\infty \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mrow> <munder> <mo movablelimits="false">sup</mo> <mrow> <mi>ξ</mi> <mo>∈</mo> <msup> <mi>S</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> </mrow> </munder> <msub> <mo>∫</mo> <msup> <mi>S</mi> <mrow> <mi>n</mi> <mo>-</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </msup> </msub> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> <msup> <mfenced close=")" open="("> <mo>log</mo> <mfrac> <mn>1</mn> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> <mo stretchy="false">⟨</mo> <mi>ξ</mi> <mo>,</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">⟩</mo> <mo stretchy="false">|</mo> </mrow> </mfrac> </mfenced> <mrow> <mn>1</mn> <mo>+</mo> <mi>γ</mi> </mrow> </msup> <mi>d</mi> <mi>σ</mi> <mrow> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>y</mi> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>∞</mi> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>with <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\gamma &gt;k\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mrow> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>&gt;</mo> <mi>k</mi> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, we demonstrate the boundedness within the range <Equation ID="Equ35"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\begin{aligned} \frac{2(\gamma +1)}{2(\gamma +1)-(k+1)}&lt;p&lt;\frac{2(\gamma +1)}{k+1}. \end{aligned}\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math display="block"> <mrow> <mtable> <mtr> <mtd columnalign="right"> <mrow> <mfrac> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> <mo>-</mo> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>k</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> </mfrac> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mi>p</mi> <mo>&lt;</mo> <mfrac> <mrow> <mn>2</mn> <mo stretchy="false">(</mo> <mi>γ</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> <mo stretchy="false">)</mo> </mrow> <mrow> <mi>k</mi> <mo>+</mo> <mn>1</mn> </mrow> </mfrac> <mo>.</mo> </mrow> </mtd> </mtr> </mtable> </mrow> </math></EquationSource> </Equation>This work improves several previously established results.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

\(L^p\) Boundedness for the Commutator of Parabolic Singular Integral with Rough Kernels

  • Shengrui Lin,
  • Jiecheng Chen,
  • Shaoyong He

摘要

This paper examines the \(L^p(\mathbb {R}^n)\) L p ( R n ) boundedness of the k-th order commutator of parabolic singular integrals. When the kernel function \(\Omega \) Ω satisfies the condition \(\begin{aligned} \sup \limits _{\xi \in S^{n-1}}\int _{S^{n-1}}|\Omega (y) |\left( \log \frac{1}{|\langle \xi ,y\rangle |}\right) ^{1+\gamma }d\sigma (y)<\infty \end{aligned}\) sup ξ S n - 1 S n - 1 | Ω ( y ) | log 1 | ξ , y | 1 + γ d σ ( y ) < with \(\gamma >k\) γ > k , we demonstrate the boundedness within the range \(\begin{aligned} \frac{2(\gamma +1)}{2(\gamma +1)-(k+1)}<p<\frac{2(\gamma +1)}{k+1}. \end{aligned}\) 2 ( γ + 1 ) 2 ( γ + 1 ) - ( k + 1 ) < p < 2 ( γ + 1 ) k + 1 . This work improves several previously established results.