<p>This article critically examines the prevalent use of the phrase <i>personal relationship with Jesus</i> as a model for describing the divine–human interface, particularly in contemporary Christian theology under Protestant evangelical influence. It explores the strengths and limitations of relational language, emphasising the need for theological nuance to avoid literal anthropomorphic interpretations of God. Drawing on insights from Richard Rohr, the article situates the incarnation of Christ within the broader context of creation as the first incarnation and discusses the Pauline concept of being “in Christ”. The biblical and ecclesial foundations for relational models are analysed, referencing key scriptural passages and magisterial documents, including those from Vatican II and subsequent papal writings. The article further engages with the thought of Thomas Aquinas, particularly his doctrine of God as “ipsum esse subsistens”, to argue for a more sophisticated understanding of the divine as the ground of being rather than a being among others. Through careful theological reflection, the article contends that while relational paradigms offer meaningful entry points for spiritual growth and understanding, they must be employed with care to preserve the transcendence and mystery inherent to the divine. Additionally, the article considers the significance of the relational model within formation and religious education, highlighting its widespread use as a paradigm for articulating the human–divine connection and its resonance with the relational nature of human experience. The importance of theological precision when incorporating relational language in educational contexts is emphasised, given the risk of anthropomorphic misunderstandings and the necessity of maintaining the unique transcendence of God.</p>