<p>NiTi shape memory alloys (SMAs) are widely used in applications ranging from medical devices to aerospace and automotive structural actuators, yet their performance is often limited by large hysteresis and highly nonlinear pseudoelasticity, which can reduce efficiency and hinder precise control. This study presents a computational investigation of two microstructural engineering strategies aimed at achieving a more linearized and predictable stress–strain response. The first strategy, termed <i>soft confinement</i>, introduces concentration modulations (CMs) produced by dissolving Ni<sub>4</sub>Ti<sub>3</sub> nanoprecipitates, generating smooth spatial gradients in the martensitic start temperature (Ms) through controlled variations in the Ni concentration field. The second strategy, <i>hard confinement</i>, employs amorphous–crystalline composite microstructures in which a non-transforming amorphous phase serves as a robust physical barrier to martensitic progression. Phase-field simulations are used to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of each approach. The results demonstrate that both soft and hard nanoconfinement strategies successfully regulate the otherwise avalanche-like martensitic transformation (MT), enabling controlled strain release and yielding a more linear, stable, and tunable superelastic response.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Soft and Hard Confinement Effects on Martensitic Transformation in NiTi Shape Memory Alloys: Insights from Phase-Field Simulations

  • Hariharan Sriram,
  • Longsheng Feng,
  • Zexu Chen,
  • Yunzhi Wang

摘要

NiTi shape memory alloys (SMAs) are widely used in applications ranging from medical devices to aerospace and automotive structural actuators, yet their performance is often limited by large hysteresis and highly nonlinear pseudoelasticity, which can reduce efficiency and hinder precise control. This study presents a computational investigation of two microstructural engineering strategies aimed at achieving a more linearized and predictable stress–strain response. The first strategy, termed soft confinement, introduces concentration modulations (CMs) produced by dissolving Ni4Ti3 nanoprecipitates, generating smooth spatial gradients in the martensitic start temperature (Ms) through controlled variations in the Ni concentration field. The second strategy, hard confinement, employs amorphous–crystalline composite microstructures in which a non-transforming amorphous phase serves as a robust physical barrier to martensitic progression. Phase-field simulations are used to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of each approach. The results demonstrate that both soft and hard nanoconfinement strategies successfully regulate the otherwise avalanche-like martensitic transformation (MT), enabling controlled strain release and yielding a more linear, stable, and tunable superelastic response.