Scholarlink

<p>This paper evaluates how features related to localization economies, innovation, and information and communications technology (ICT), influence the location of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) and the emergence of new specialization in KIBS across NUTS3 regions in Italy over the period 2007–2020. We adopt a Spatial Durbin Model (SDM), which uncovers a strong presence of interregional positive spatial spillover effects from neighbours’ NUTS3 regions and distinctive sectoral patterns. Common drivers, such as location in capital cities, input–output linkages between KIBS and manufacturing, innovation and ICT are confirmed to be key drivers of KIBS location. However, turning to the analysis of factors triggering new specialization across the KIBS sectors, a prominent role for urbanization economies and ICT emerges, as well as a more nuanced one for manufacturing intermediate demand and innovation. The implications point to the relevance of appropriate policies accounting for geographic and sectoral heterogeneity, able to face the strong intensity of the North–South divide and the capital-periphery gaps in KIBS location, particularly in the technology-based KIBS (T-KIBS).</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

New KIBS specialisation in the Italian provinces over 2007–2020: proximity, ICT and localisation

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月24日

查看全文
  • Marinella Boccia,
  • Anna Maria Ferragina

摘要

This paper evaluates how features related to localization economies, innovation, and information and communications technology (ICT), influence the location of knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS) and the emergence of new specialization in KIBS across NUTS3 regions in Italy over the period 2007–2020. We adopt a Spatial Durbin Model (SDM), which uncovers a strong presence of interregional positive spatial spillover effects from neighbours’ NUTS3 regions and distinctive sectoral patterns. Common drivers, such as location in capital cities, input–output linkages between KIBS and manufacturing, innovation and ICT are confirmed to be key drivers of KIBS location. However, turning to the analysis of factors triggering new specialization across the KIBS sectors, a prominent role for urbanization economies and ICT emerges, as well as a more nuanced one for manufacturing intermediate demand and innovation. The implications point to the relevance of appropriate policies accounting for geographic and sectoral heterogeneity, able to face the strong intensity of the North–South divide and the capital-periphery gaps in KIBS location, particularly in the technology-based KIBS (T-KIBS).