<p>In the analysis of operant behavior, there is little empirical research on the relationship between observing responses and primary stimulus generalization. This work aimed to investigate eye fixations when S+ and S- dimensions were varied on generalization tests. Ten university students participated. Their training consisted of a MULT VI 1&#xa0;s EXT schedule followed by MULT VI 2&#xa0;s EXT schedule. Discriminative stimuli were three Gabor line tilts. S+ and S- had 45º and 135º slopes, respectively. After participants achieved discrimination indices of 75%, generalization tests in extinction began. There were two different conditions: (1)&#xa0;S+ was replaced by stimuli with angles of 15<sup>ο</sup>, 30<sup>ο</sup>, 45<sup>ο</sup>, 60<sup>ο</sup>, and 75<sup>ο</sup> (five participants). (2) S- was replaced by 105<sup>ο</sup>, 120<sup>ο</sup>, 135<sup>ο</sup>,<sup>,</sup> 150º, and 165º (five participants). In both training and tests, eye tracking equipment recorded observing responses defined as visual fixations. S+ variations yielded sharp observing response gradients. However, S- variations yielded flattened, bell-shaped, and U-shaped observing response gradients. These data contribute to the limited information on human observing during tests of primary stimulus generalization. The study provides a methodology for accomplishing a more complete characterization of behavioral processes that may be operative when normally capable adults are exposed to variations in S+ and S- on generalization tasks.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Tracking Eye Fixations during Stimulus Generalization Tests

  • Juliano Setsuo Violin Kanamota,
  • Gerson Yukio Tomanari,
  • William J. McIlvane

摘要

In the analysis of operant behavior, there is little empirical research on the relationship between observing responses and primary stimulus generalization. This work aimed to investigate eye fixations when S+ and S- dimensions were varied on generalization tests. Ten university students participated. Their training consisted of a MULT VI 1 s EXT schedule followed by MULT VI 2 s EXT schedule. Discriminative stimuli were three Gabor line tilts. S+ and S- had 45º and 135º slopes, respectively. After participants achieved discrimination indices of 75%, generalization tests in extinction began. There were two different conditions: (1) S+ was replaced by stimuli with angles of 15ο, 30ο, 45ο, 60ο, and 75ο (five participants). (2) S- was replaced by 105ο, 120ο, 135ο,, 150º, and 165º (five participants). In both training and tests, eye tracking equipment recorded observing responses defined as visual fixations. S+ variations yielded sharp observing response gradients. However, S- variations yielded flattened, bell-shaped, and U-shaped observing response gradients. These data contribute to the limited information on human observing during tests of primary stimulus generalization. The study provides a methodology for accomplishing a more complete characterization of behavioral processes that may be operative when normally capable adults are exposed to variations in S+ and S- on generalization tasks.