Scholarlink

<p>An evolutionary naturalism hospitable for life and its sentience should have been a philosophical priority since Darwin, but dualistic temptations have swayed vitalisms, emergentisms, and panpsychisms. Tracing sentience’s evolution from biological beginnings was the modest naturalistic proposal from pragmatist John Dewey. Curiously, his endorsement in his 1925 <i>Experience and Nature</i> of affective sentience across the animal world has gone almost entirely unnoticed by philosophy, psychology, and animal research. However, those disciplines may be converging on minimum expectations for sentient learning and behavior that Dewey had already proposed and defended. For Dewey, identifying and explaining cognitive conduct cannot be about outer behavioral adjustments or inner physiological operations taken separately – their organized coordination within environing conditions is the minimum situation for scientific investigations. An organism is perpetually engaging its environs (what it can sense) through enactions (what it can do) from energizations (what it can power) activated from its sensings-doings, in order to sustain itself as an organized entity. Hard dilemmas about demoting feeling to impotence or banishing experience from nature dissolve when vitality’s own qualities are empirically respected. Dewey’s organic naturalism endorses zoopsychism, finding that behavioral, life, and physical sciences together discover how the existential and experiential lives of animals are accountable in naturalistic terms.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The sentience of animals in John Dewey’s organic naturalism

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月8日

查看全文
  • John R. Shook

摘要

An evolutionary naturalism hospitable for life and its sentience should have been a philosophical priority since Darwin, but dualistic temptations have swayed vitalisms, emergentisms, and panpsychisms. Tracing sentience’s evolution from biological beginnings was the modest naturalistic proposal from pragmatist John Dewey. Curiously, his endorsement in his 1925 Experience and Nature of affective sentience across the animal world has gone almost entirely unnoticed by philosophy, psychology, and animal research. However, those disciplines may be converging on minimum expectations for sentient learning and behavior that Dewey had already proposed and defended. For Dewey, identifying and explaining cognitive conduct cannot be about outer behavioral adjustments or inner physiological operations taken separately – their organized coordination within environing conditions is the minimum situation for scientific investigations. An organism is perpetually engaging its environs (what it can sense) through enactions (what it can do) from energizations (what it can power) activated from its sensings-doings, in order to sustain itself as an organized entity. Hard dilemmas about demoting feeling to impotence or banishing experience from nature dissolve when vitality’s own qualities are empirically respected. Dewey’s organic naturalism endorses zoopsychism, finding that behavioral, life, and physical sciences together discover how the existential and experiential lives of animals are accountable in naturalistic terms.