错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Racial and Ethnic Disparity for Cancer Mortality in General and Single-Payer Healthcare Systems in the United States

  • Rock Bum Kim,
  • Emily Zhou,
  • Kaitlin N. Swinnerton,
  • Jennifer La,
  • Shengling Ma,
  • Mrinal Ranjan,
  • Nhan V. Do,
  • Mary T. Brophy,
  • Nathanael R. Fillmore,
  • Ang Li

摘要

Background

It remains unclear what factors significantly drive racial disparity in cancer survival in the United States (US). We compared adjusted mortality outcomes in cancer patients from different racial and ethnic groups on a population level in the US and a single-payer healthcare system.

Patients and Methods

We selected adult patients with incident solid and hematologic malignancies from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 2011–2020 and Veteran Affairs national healthcare system (VA) 2011–2021. We classified the self-reported NIH race and ethnicity into non-Hispanic White (NHW), non-Hispanic Black (NHB), non-Hispanic Asian Pacific Islander (API), and Hispanic. Cox regression models for hazard ratio of racial and ethnic groups were built after adjusting confounders in each cohort.

Results

The study included 3,104,657 patients from SEER and 287,619 patients from VA. There were notable differences in baseline characteristics in the two cohorts. In SEER, adjusted HR for mortality was 1.12 (95% CI, 1.12–1.13), 1.03 (95% CI, 1.03–1.04), and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.90–0.92), for NHB, Hispanic, and API patients, respectively, vs. NHW. In VA, adjusted HR was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92–0.95), 0.84 (95% CI, 0.82–0.87), and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.93–1.00) for NHB, Hispanic, and API, respectively, vs. NHW. Additional subgroup analyses by cancer types, age, and sex did not significantly change these associations.

Conclusions

Racial disparity continues to persist on a population level in the US especially for NHB vs. NHW patients, where the adjusted mortality was 12% higher in the general population but 6% lower in the single-payer VA system.