Scholarlink

<p>Despite the rise of the medical humanities in general in recent decades, theological bioethics—during a very similar period of time—was marginalized from many central bioethical discussions. This is problematic for a number of reasons. First, because theologians invented the discipline of bioethics and deserve a place at the table. Second, because the marginalization is often ideologically motivated. And third, because the vision of the human person that theologians bring to the table is essential for understanding the moral status of the proundly disabled.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Proper care for the profoundly disabled depends on theology being recognized as queen of medical humanities

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月2日

查看全文
  • Charles Camosy

摘要

Despite the rise of the medical humanities in general in recent decades, theological bioethics—during a very similar period of time—was marginalized from many central bioethical discussions. This is problematic for a number of reasons. First, because theologians invented the discipline of bioethics and deserve a place at the table. Second, because the marginalization is often ideologically motivated. And third, because the vision of the human person that theologians bring to the table is essential for understanding the moral status of the proundly disabled.