Scholarlink

<p>In this paper, we aim to examine key episodes in the historical development of the concept of continuity, tracing its development from Euler’s early analytical works to the beginning of the nineteenth century. Particular attention is given to Euler’s formulation of an analytical criterion of continuity and to a critical, yet often overlooked, aspect of his approach: his treatment of certain curves in the second volume of the <i>Introductio in analysin infinitorum</i>. Our analysis shows that Euler’s criterion encounters a fundamental difficulty when applied, a difficulty that, while seemingly recognized by Euler himself, could not be adequately resolved within the constraints of his theoretical framework. By considering the contributions of later mathematicians such as Arbogast, Charles, and Fourier, we show how Euler’s notion of continuity was progressively found inadequate in light of new mathematical developments. This historical trajectory not only highlights the limitations of Euler’s notion of continuity but also shows that the recognition of these limitations constituted a necessary step in laying the conceptual groundwork for the emergence of the modern, analytically grounded definition of continuity.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The notion of continuity in Euler and its development in the works of Arbogast, Charles and Fourier

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年3月27日

查看全文
  • Anabel Jáuregui-Hernández,
  • Carmen Martínez-Adame

摘要

In this paper, we aim to examine key episodes in the historical development of the concept of continuity, tracing its development from Euler’s early analytical works to the beginning of the nineteenth century. Particular attention is given to Euler’s formulation of an analytical criterion of continuity and to a critical, yet often overlooked, aspect of his approach: his treatment of certain curves in the second volume of the Introductio in analysin infinitorum. Our analysis shows that Euler’s criterion encounters a fundamental difficulty when applied, a difficulty that, while seemingly recognized by Euler himself, could not be adequately resolved within the constraints of his theoretical framework. By considering the contributions of later mathematicians such as Arbogast, Charles, and Fourier, we show how Euler’s notion of continuity was progressively found inadequate in light of new mathematical developments. This historical trajectory not only highlights the limitations of Euler’s notion of continuity but also shows that the recognition of these limitations constituted a necessary step in laying the conceptual groundwork for the emergence of the modern, analytically grounded definition of continuity.