<p>This study developed an interpretable data-driven framework for estimating the factor of safety in slope stability analysis using symbolic regression. A dataset of 10,000 slope cases was assembled, incorporating geotechnical, geometric, hydrological, and reinforcement parameters within physically consistent ranges. Symbolic regression was applied to derive closed-form mathematical expressions that captured nonlinear relationships between input variables and slope stability. The resulting models were evaluated against conventional approaches, including infinite slope and Bishop-type methods, as well as machine learning benchmarks such as linear regression, decision trees, random forests, and neural networks. The symbolic model achieved high predictive accuracy with a coefficient of determination of 0.96 on the test dataset. Sensitivity analysis based on partial derivatives quantified the influence of cohesion, friction angle, slope angle, and pore pressure ratio, confirming physically consistent trends. Probabilistic evaluation using Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated the model’s capability to estimate variability in stability and the probability of failure. The results showed that symbolic regression provided accurate predictions while retaining explicit mathematical structure suitable for engineering interpretation and reliability-based applications.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Interpretable Symbolic Regression for Reliability-Aware Slope Stability Analysis

  • Priyam Nath Bhowmik,
  • Kezia Saini,
  • Pradyut Anand,
  • Bayram Ateş

摘要

This study developed an interpretable data-driven framework for estimating the factor of safety in slope stability analysis using symbolic regression. A dataset of 10,000 slope cases was assembled, incorporating geotechnical, geometric, hydrological, and reinforcement parameters within physically consistent ranges. Symbolic regression was applied to derive closed-form mathematical expressions that captured nonlinear relationships between input variables and slope stability. The resulting models were evaluated against conventional approaches, including infinite slope and Bishop-type methods, as well as machine learning benchmarks such as linear regression, decision trees, random forests, and neural networks. The symbolic model achieved high predictive accuracy with a coefficient of determination of 0.96 on the test dataset. Sensitivity analysis based on partial derivatives quantified the influence of cohesion, friction angle, slope angle, and pore pressure ratio, confirming physically consistent trends. Probabilistic evaluation using Monte Carlo simulation demonstrated the model’s capability to estimate variability in stability and the probability of failure. The results showed that symbolic regression provided accurate predictions while retaining explicit mathematical structure suitable for engineering interpretation and reliability-based applications.