<p>This paper presented experimental and numerical model test of braced excavation to find out the variation of design parameters (i.e., bending moment and lateral deflection of the sheet pile wall, vertical ground settlement of backfill soil). The depth of the excavation, support system and geometry of the sheet pile were kept constant while internal friction angles (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40515_2025_591_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\phi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ϕ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 25 to 45<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40515_2025_591_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="7" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="9" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^\circ \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mo>∘</mo> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) of the sand were varied. The results obtained from the developed numerical model of braced excavation were validated with the attached sensor data of the present experimental studies. The increment of the friction angle of the sand influenced the behaviour of design parameters of the excavation. In loose sand range (i.e., <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40515_2025_591_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\phi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ϕ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 25 to 32<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40515_2025_591_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="7" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="9" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^\circ \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mo>∘</mo> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) the magnitudes of the design parameters decreased rapidly (approximately exponential) with the increment of <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40515_2025_591_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\phi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ϕ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> whereas, in case of medium dense sand range (i.e., <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40515_2025_591_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\phi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ϕ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 32 to 36<InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40515_2025_591_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="7" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="9" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^\circ \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mo>∘</mo> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>) and dense sand range (i.e., <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40515_2025_591_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="16" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\phi \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>ϕ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> = 36 to 45<InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40515_2025_591_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="7" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="9" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(^\circ \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mmultiscripts> <mrow /> <mrow /> <mo>∘</mo> </mmultiscripts> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation>), the magnitude of design parameters decreased linearly. The maximum normalized bending moment and lateral deflection of sheet pile decreased 28% and 34% respectively whereas a reduction of 28% was observed for vertical ground settlement for loose sand range.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Ground Movement and Retaining Wall Response due to Excavation in Granular Soil: Experimental and Numerical Study

  • Sriyam Datta,
  • Puspendu Ray,
  • Ambarish Ghosh

摘要

This paper presented experimental and numerical model test of braced excavation to find out the variation of design parameters (i.e., bending moment and lateral deflection of the sheet pile wall, vertical ground settlement of backfill soil). The depth of the excavation, support system and geometry of the sheet pile were kept constant while internal friction angles ( \(\phi \) ϕ = 25 to 45 \(^\circ \) ) of the sand were varied. The results obtained from the developed numerical model of braced excavation were validated with the attached sensor data of the present experimental studies. The increment of the friction angle of the sand influenced the behaviour of design parameters of the excavation. In loose sand range (i.e., \(\phi \) ϕ = 25 to 32 \(^\circ \) ) the magnitudes of the design parameters decreased rapidly (approximately exponential) with the increment of \(\phi \) ϕ whereas, in case of medium dense sand range (i.e., \(\phi \) ϕ = 32 to 36 \(^\circ \) ) and dense sand range (i.e., \(\phi \) ϕ = 36 to 45 \(^\circ \) ), the magnitude of design parameters decreased linearly. The maximum normalized bending moment and lateral deflection of sheet pile decreased 28% and 34% respectively whereas a reduction of 28% was observed for vertical ground settlement for loose sand range.