Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) enables identification of patients eligible for targeted treatments, making it essential in the management of advanced cancer. This retrospective real-world study compared actionable mutations in CGP-tested patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors to those who received single-gene/small-panel (SP) tests.</p> Methods <p>Patients aged &gt; 18&#xa0;years with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, or melanoma) with a CGP or SP test reported between 1 January 2018, and 31 December 2022, were included. OncoKB-derived actionability was compared between the two cohorts. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for baseline characteristics. A weighted generalized linear model with log link was used to report actionability ratio (AR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p> Results <p>Among 406 patients (CGP-tested cohort: 202, SP-tested cohort: 204), approximately half were diagnosed with NSCLC. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, CGP testing detected more actionable alterations than SP: OncoKB level 1 (50.0% versus 31.4%; AR 1.76 [95% CI: 1.24, 2.51]; <i>p</i> = 0.002), OncoKB level 2 (22.8% versus 10.3%; AR 2.53 [95% CI: 1.17, 5.48]; <i>p</i> = 0.018), and OncoKB level 1 or level 2 or level R1 (55.9% versus 41.2%; AR 1.5 [95% CI: 1.11, 2.01]; <i>p</i> = 0.008).</p> Conclusions <p>CGP testing identified more actionable genetic alterations compared with SP testing methods for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, or melanoma. Expanding reimbursement and coverage for CGP testing as well as expanding CGP use can facilitate equitable treatment access for patients with advanced/metastatic cancer.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Real-World Actionability Analysis of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Versus Single/Small-Gene Panels

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月21日

查看全文
  • Paul Spin,
  • Bela Bapat,
  • Chad Moretz,
  • Robert Dumanois,
  • Adrienne M. Gilligan,
  • Mostafa Shokoohi,
  • Emily Borgundvaag,
  • John Fox,
  • Carlo Bifulco,
  • David Bartlett

摘要

Introduction

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) enables identification of patients eligible for targeted treatments, making it essential in the management of advanced cancer. This retrospective real-world study compared actionable mutations in CGP-tested patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors to those who received single-gene/small-panel (SP) tests.

Methods

Patients aged > 18 years with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, or melanoma) with a CGP or SP test reported between 1 January 2018, and 31 December 2022, were included. OncoKB-derived actionability was compared between the two cohorts. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for baseline characteristics. A weighted generalized linear model with log link was used to report actionability ratio (AR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

Among 406 patients (CGP-tested cohort: 202, SP-tested cohort: 204), approximately half were diagnosed with NSCLC. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, CGP testing detected more actionable alterations than SP: OncoKB level 1 (50.0% versus 31.4%; AR 1.76 [95% CI: 1.24, 2.51]; p = 0.002), OncoKB level 2 (22.8% versus 10.3%; AR 2.53 [95% CI: 1.17, 5.48]; p = 0.018), and OncoKB level 1 or level 2 or level R1 (55.9% versus 41.2%; AR 1.5 [95% CI: 1.11, 2.01]; p = 0.008).

Conclusions

CGP testing identified more actionable genetic alterations compared with SP testing methods for patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, or melanoma. Expanding reimbursement and coverage for CGP testing as well as expanding CGP use can facilitate equitable treatment access for patients with advanced/metastatic cancer.