Purpose <p>A growing number of studies are focusing on the possibilities of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT in diagnosis of tumors of various localizations. It has been established that [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT has high diagnostic efficiency in head and neck tumors, lung cancer, breast cancer, abdominal tumors, as well as in sarcomas, both in the primary tumor detection and in search of distant metastases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT for the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue sarcoma, compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT.</p> Methods <p>We screened all patients (pts) who underwent dual-tracer [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT from 2022–2025. Both examinations were performed within 1&#xa0;week for assessment of primary tumor, local relapse or distant metastasis. Positive lesions on PET/CT images were verified by biopsy, 3–12-month follow-up and MRI/contrast-enhanced CT. A paired t test was used to compare the semiquantitative values (SUV<sub>max</sub> and TBR) of [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT in tumor lesions. Primary tumors in patients were detected by morphological verification. To evaluate metastases in other organs and lymph nodes, we used histological data, MRI or dynamic follow-up. These results were used to calculate the diagnostic efficiency (sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (Ac)) for each modality on a per-region basis.</p> Results <p>Twenty-six patients (15 women and 11 men; average age – 44&#xa0;years) representing 17 sarcoma subtypes were included in the final analysis. A total of 128 tumor lesions were identified. Compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI demonstrated significantly higher uptake in dedifferentiated liposarcoma, malignant solitary fibrous tumors, and fibrosarcoma (mean SUV<sub>max</sub>: 29.26 ± 16.90 vs. 5.93 ± 5.60; p &lt; 0.001). Conversely, [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG demonstrated higher uptake intensity in synovial sarcoma, pleomorphic sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and intimal sarcoma (mean SUV<sub>max</sub>: 10.77 ± 4.64 vs. 5.24 ± 2.24; p = 0.0089). On a per-region basis, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI yielded a sensitivity of 68.52%, specificity of 66.67%, and accuracy of 68.22%, compared with 71.57%, 34.62%, and 64.06%, respectively, for [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG.</p> Conclusion <p>Compared with [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT demonstrates superior diagnostic capability for specific subtypes, including dedifferentiated liposarcoma, malignant solitary fibrous tumors, and fibrosarcoma. However, for other subtypes, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-FAPI provides comparable or inferior diagnostic yield. These findings suggest that radiotracer selection should be tailored to specific histological subtypes to optimize diagnostic accuracy in sarcoma management.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparative diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG versus [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT in sarcoma imaging

  • Maria Komarova,
  • Ekaterina Davydova,
  • Ilias Miltiadis,
  • Valentin Sinitsyn,
  • Artem Pronin,
  • Pavel Burko,
  • Alexander Martinovich

摘要

Purpose

A growing number of studies are focusing on the possibilities of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT in diagnosis of tumors of various localizations. It has been established that [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT has high diagnostic efficiency in head and neck tumors, lung cancer, breast cancer, abdominal tumors, as well as in sarcomas, both in the primary tumor detection and in search of distant metastases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT for the diagnosis of bone and soft tissue sarcoma, compared with [18F]FDG PET/CT.

Methods

We screened all patients (pts) who underwent dual-tracer [68Ga]Ga-FAPI and [18F]FDG PET/CT from 2022–2025. Both examinations were performed within 1 week for assessment of primary tumor, local relapse or distant metastasis. Positive lesions on PET/CT images were verified by biopsy, 3–12-month follow-up and MRI/contrast-enhanced CT. A paired t test was used to compare the semiquantitative values (SUVmax and TBR) of [18F]FDG and [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT in tumor lesions. Primary tumors in patients were detected by morphological verification. To evaluate metastases in other organs and lymph nodes, we used histological data, MRI or dynamic follow-up. These results were used to calculate the diagnostic efficiency (sensitivity (Se), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and accuracy (Ac)) for each modality on a per-region basis.

Results

Twenty-six patients (15 women and 11 men; average age – 44 years) representing 17 sarcoma subtypes were included in the final analysis. A total of 128 tumor lesions were identified. Compared with [18F]FDG, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI demonstrated significantly higher uptake in dedifferentiated liposarcoma, malignant solitary fibrous tumors, and fibrosarcoma (mean SUVmax: 29.26 ± 16.90 vs. 5.93 ± 5.60; p < 0.001). Conversely, [18F]FDG demonstrated higher uptake intensity in synovial sarcoma, pleomorphic sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and intimal sarcoma (mean SUVmax: 10.77 ± 4.64 vs. 5.24 ± 2.24; p = 0.0089). On a per-region basis, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI yielded a sensitivity of 68.52%, specificity of 66.67%, and accuracy of 68.22%, compared with 71.57%, 34.62%, and 64.06%, respectively, for [18F]FDG.

Conclusion

Compared with [18F]FDG, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT demonstrates superior diagnostic capability for specific subtypes, including dedifferentiated liposarcoma, malignant solitary fibrous tumors, and fibrosarcoma. However, for other subtypes, [68Ga]Ga-FAPI provides comparable or inferior diagnostic yield. These findings suggest that radiotracer selection should be tailored to specific histological subtypes to optimize diagnostic accuracy in sarcoma management.