Purpose <p>The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in metastatic prostate cancer patients scheduled for radionuclide therapy compared to [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT.</p> Methods <p>The intensity of tracer accumulation in pathological bone lesions on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was measured as the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV<sub>max</sub>) and compared to the background activity of normal bone. A lesion-based comparison was used to calculate the performance of both tracers. In addition, SUV<sub>max</sub> of PET-positive bone lesions were analyzed in relation to morphologic features on CT.</p> Results <p>A total of 14 patients were included in this study. In contrast to 581 PET-positive lesions suggestive of bone metastases on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT, 505 of the lesions were also judged positive on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. The intensity of tracer accumulation in pathological skeletal lesions was significantly higher on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT compared to [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Background activity of normal bone was lower on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, with a median SUV<sub>max</sub> of 0.567 compared to 0.849 on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT. Based on morphologic lesion characterization on CT, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT revealed median SUV<sub>max</sub> values of 10.42 for osteosclerotic, 17.28 for osteolytic, and 11.38 for lesions not visible on CT, whereas on [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, median SUV<sub>max</sub> values of 8.68 for osteosclerotic, 19.38 for osteolytic, and 6.10 for lesions not seen on CT were measured. The intensity of tracer accumulation between [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA and [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was significantly higher in osteosclerotic (<i>p</i> = 0.001) and lesions not visible on CT (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001).</p> Conclusion <p>In comparison to [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT is a comparable imaging modality in metastatic prostate cancer patients scheduled for radionuclide therapy. Our study indicates that [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT could be combined with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases for evaluation prior to radionuclide therapy.</p> Trial registration <p>ChiCTR, ChiCTR2200064487. Registered 10 October 2022, <a href="https://www.chictr.org.cn">https://www.chictr.org.cn</a>, ChiCTR2200064487.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Comparison of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in metastatic prostate cancer patients prior to radionuclide therapy

  • Tengfei Li,
  • Jintao Zhang,
  • Yue Zhang,
  • Wenjie Pei,
  • Qingchu Hua,
  • Yueqi Zhao,
  • Yu Zhang,
  • Yue Chen

摘要

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in metastatic prostate cancer patients scheduled for radionuclide therapy compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT.

Methods

The intensity of tracer accumulation in pathological bone lesions on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was measured as the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and compared to the background activity of normal bone. A lesion-based comparison was used to calculate the performance of both tracers. In addition, SUVmax of PET-positive bone lesions were analyzed in relation to morphologic features on CT.

Results

A total of 14 patients were included in this study. In contrast to 581 PET-positive lesions suggestive of bone metastases on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT, 505 of the lesions were also judged positive on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. The intensity of tracer accumulation in pathological skeletal lesions was significantly higher on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT compared to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. Background activity of normal bone was lower on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, with a median SUVmax of 0.567 compared to 0.849 on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT. Based on morphologic lesion characterization on CT, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT revealed median SUVmax values of 10.42 for osteosclerotic, 17.28 for osteolytic, and 11.38 for lesions not visible on CT, whereas on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, median SUVmax values of 8.68 for osteosclerotic, 19.38 for osteolytic, and 6.10 for lesions not seen on CT were measured. The intensity of tracer accumulation between [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was significantly higher in osteosclerotic (p = 0.001) and lesions not visible on CT (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In comparison to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT is a comparable imaging modality in metastatic prostate cancer patients scheduled for radionuclide therapy. Our study indicates that [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT could be combined with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-IBA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases for evaluation prior to radionuclide therapy.

Trial registration

ChiCTR, ChiCTR2200064487. Registered 10 October 2022, https://www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2200064487.