<p><OrderedList> <ListItem> <ItemNumber>1.</ItemNumber> <ItemContent> <p><b>Claims seeking recognition of the nullity of a trade mark registration that imitates or reproduces another well-known trade mark are not subject to limitation, provided that the applicant’s bad faith is demonstrated. That conclusion is supported by a precedent of the Superior Court of Justice’s Third Panel.</b></p> </ItemContent> </ListItem> <ListItem> <ItemNumber>2.</ItemNumber> <ItemContent> <p><b>A trade mark nullity action based on the protection granted by Art. 124(XVII) of Brazil’s Industrial Property Law (IPL) to artistic and scientific works and their titles is subject to the 5-year limitation period laid down in Art. 174 of that statute.</b></p> </ItemContent> </ListItem> <ListItem> <ItemNumber>3.</ItemNumber> <ItemContent> <p><b>As an exception to the general rule in the legal system that the exercise of claims is subject to a limitation period, the rule on exemption therefrom laid down in the Paris Convention does not permit extensive or analogous interpretation.</b></p> </ItemContent> </ListItem> </OrderedList></p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

“Chiquititas”

摘要

1.

Claims seeking recognition of the nullity of a trade mark registration that imitates or reproduces another well-known trade mark are not subject to limitation, provided that the applicant’s bad faith is demonstrated. That conclusion is supported by a precedent of the Superior Court of Justice’s Third Panel.

2.

A trade mark nullity action based on the protection granted by Art. 124(XVII) of Brazil’s Industrial Property Law (IPL) to artistic and scientific works and their titles is subject to the 5-year limitation period laid down in Art. 174 of that statute.

3.

As an exception to the general rule in the legal system that the exercise of claims is subject to a limitation period, the rule on exemption therefrom laid down in the Paris Convention does not permit extensive or analogous interpretation.