Scholarlink

<p><b>With regard to patents jointly owned by two or more parties, the reference in Art. 6(1) Code of Insustrial Property to the rules on joint ownership of rights in rem must be understood to mean that under Art. 1102(1) Civil Code, in the absence of any agreement to the contrary, individual co-owners are precluded from exploiting the invention economically</b> <Emphasis Type="BoldItalic">uti singulus,</Emphasis> <b>as this would affect the protection granted by the patent, alter the intended use of the asset and thus infringe the exclusive rights of the other co-owner(s).</b></p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

“4Ocean”

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月1日

查看全文

摘要

With regard to patents jointly owned by two or more parties, the reference in Art. 6(1) Code of Insustrial Property to the rules on joint ownership of rights in rem must be understood to mean that under Art. 1102(1) Civil Code, in the absence of any agreement to the contrary, individual co-owners are precluded from exploiting the invention economically uti singulus, as this would affect the protection granted by the patent, alter the intended use of the asset and thus infringe the exclusive rights of the other co-owner(s).