Scholarlink

<p>Lawmakers and administrative agencies around the globe are debating whether the use of copyrighted content for AI training does or should require the rights holder’s consent. This article examines legislation and policy debates in the U.S., Canada, the UK, the EU, Israel, China, Singapore, and Japan. Issues of control, compensation, transparency and legal certainty dominate the discussion. Countries are trying to recalibrate the balance of interests, either in favour of AI companies, or by supporting rights holders – for example, with copyright-related transparency obligations. EU copyright law offers a relatively favourable environment for AI companies. Ultimately, however, copyright law is not the decisive factor when AI companies choose the location of their training facilities.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Control and Compensation. A Comparative Analysis of Copyright Exceptions for Training Generative AI

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年3月4日

查看全文
  • Katharina de la Durantaye

摘要

Lawmakers and administrative agencies around the globe are debating whether the use of copyrighted content for AI training does or should require the rights holder’s consent. This article examines legislation and policy debates in the U.S., Canada, the UK, the EU, Israel, China, Singapore, and Japan. Issues of control, compensation, transparency and legal certainty dominate the discussion. Countries are trying to recalibrate the balance of interests, either in favour of AI companies, or by supporting rights holders – for example, with copyright-related transparency obligations. EU copyright law offers a relatively favourable environment for AI companies. Ultimately, however, copyright law is not the decisive factor when AI companies choose the location of their training facilities.