Scholarlink

<p>The paper explores the relationship between the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and the recent jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU). The CAS’ embeddedness within the legal framework of international arbitration has recently been challenged amidst a general backlash against sports arbitration from Europe. CAS arbitration featured prominently in the CJEU’s recent judgments in <i>International Skating Union</i> and <i>RFC Seraing</i>. Following these decisions, the paper examines how the 1958 New York Convention and EU law interact in the sports arbitration context. It argues that compulsory arbitration agreements providing for CAS arbitration fall within the scope of application of the 1958 New York Convention. According to the jurisprudence of the CJEU, EU Member States are required to review arbitration agreements and arbitral awards for violations of EU public policy. The paper concludes that this duty is reconcilable with the obligations of EU Member States as Contracting States of the 1958 New York Convention.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

CAS arbitration and the 1958 New York Convention after ISU and RFC seraing

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月16日

查看全文
  • Ben Köhler

摘要

The paper explores the relationship between the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and the recent jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU). The CAS’ embeddedness within the legal framework of international arbitration has recently been challenged amidst a general backlash against sports arbitration from Europe. CAS arbitration featured prominently in the CJEU’s recent judgments in International Skating Union and RFC Seraing. Following these decisions, the paper examines how the 1958 New York Convention and EU law interact in the sports arbitration context. It argues that compulsory arbitration agreements providing for CAS arbitration fall within the scope of application of the 1958 New York Convention. According to the jurisprudence of the CJEU, EU Member States are required to review arbitration agreements and arbitral awards for violations of EU public policy. The paper concludes that this duty is reconcilable with the obligations of EU Member States as Contracting States of the 1958 New York Convention.