<p>Mukhopadhyay (Calc Stat Assoc Bul 66:55–62, 2014a), illustrated non-sufficiency of a continuously distributed statistic <InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40300_2025_289_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="31" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left| X\right| \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close="|" open="|"> <mi>X</mi> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> via conditioning arguments. In a continuous case, however, finer arguments behind the success of conditioning often remains out of reach for some beginners. Since publication of Mukhopadhyay (2014a), queries poured in over the years seeking analogous clarifications with the help of discrete examples. In discrete situations, calculations of conditional probabilities appear more tangible and transparent. In this paper, we begin with a general construction and then focus on explicit <i>discrete</i> probability models leading to a decisive conclusion of sufficiency or non-sufficiency of <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40300_2025_289_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="31" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\left| X\right| \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mfenced close="|" open="|"> <mi>X</mi> </mfenced> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> for an unknown parameter <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="40300_2025_289_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="14" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\theta \)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mi>θ</mi> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> when <i>X</i> has a probability mass function. The discrete constructions from this paper and the continuous analogs from Mukhopadhyay (2014a) form a solid set of basic supplements to Mukhopadhyay and Banerjee (Metron 71:33–38, 2013).</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Discrete examples of sufficient or non-sufficient statistic \(\left| X\right| \) for unknown \(\mathbf {\theta }\) via conditioning

  • Nitis Mukhopadhyay

摘要

Mukhopadhyay (Calc Stat Assoc Bul 66:55–62, 2014a), illustrated non-sufficiency of a continuously distributed statistic \(\left| X\right| \) X via conditioning arguments. In a continuous case, however, finer arguments behind the success of conditioning often remains out of reach for some beginners. Since publication of Mukhopadhyay (2014a), queries poured in over the years seeking analogous clarifications with the help of discrete examples. In discrete situations, calculations of conditional probabilities appear more tangible and transparent. In this paper, we begin with a general construction and then focus on explicit discrete probability models leading to a decisive conclusion of sufficiency or non-sufficiency of \(\left| X\right| \) X for an unknown parameter \(\theta \) θ when X has a probability mass function. The discrete constructions from this paper and the continuous analogs from Mukhopadhyay (2014a) form a solid set of basic supplements to Mukhopadhyay and Banerjee (Metron 71:33–38, 2013).