Scholarlink

Background and Objectives <p>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive and fatal neurological disease that leads to death within 2–5 years of diagnosis for more than 80% of people living with ALS (PLWALS). The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) developed practice parameters—general principles to guide clinicians in managing ALS—encouraging multidisciplinary care (MDC) but does not recommend specific healthcare delivery models. Three healthcare delivery models have evolved: a traditional model, a triage model, and a non-triage model. This study aims to describe preferences for and satisfaction with various models, among PLWALS and their caregivers (CALS), along with their perceptions of how their care aligns with AAN guidelines.</p> Methods <p>A cross-sectional observational study utilizing a web-based survey was distributed via email to PLWALS and CALS. Three multi-assessment questionnaires were developed and tailored for PLWALS, CALS, and former CALS. Best-worst scaling (object case) data were analyzed using a best-minus-worst approach and descriptive statistics were calculated from means, t-tests and chi-square.</p> Results <p>The combined sample included 378 respondents: 254 PLWALS (67.20%) and 124 CALS (32.80%; composed of 79 current caregivers [20.90%] and 45 former caregivers [11.90%]). The mean respondent age was 61.09 years (SD 11.1). The majority of the sample was white (92.86%), insured by Medicare (61.11%), and married/partnered (79.10%). Respondents preferred a non-triage model the most and a traditional model the least; 88.20% (CI: 84.92–91.49) were extremely likely to choose a non-triage model if given the choice and 83.12% (CI: 79.29–86.92) of respondents ranked non-triage as most preferred. A traditional model was ranked as the least preferred model in 75.28% (CI: 70.78–79.78) of respondents. The most important factors driving respondent preferences were ALS expertise and team-based care. Overall, respondents are satisfied with their care teams. PLWALS utilizing non-triage MDC models reported more adherence to quality care measures compared with those utilizing triage and traditional models.</p> Discussion <p>Respondent preference for non-triage models is consistent with the importance they place on the features of non-triage models. However, these findings should be understood in the context of our sample in which a large majority of respondents were receiving care via a non-triage model. To ensure ALS care delivery is patient-centered, practice parameters that aim to guide clinicians in managing ALS should provide more guidance to MDCs to deliver care aligned with patient preferences and values. Efforts should focus on sustainable financial models that can better facilitate non-triage models of care.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Preferences for Healthcare Delivery in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS): A Survey of Patients and Caregivers in the United States

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月27日

查看全文
  • Ilene L. Hollin,
  • Hristelina Ilieva,
  • Piera Pasinelli,
  • Laura Chisholm,
  • Terry Heiman-Patterson

摘要

Background and Objectives

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rapidly progressive and fatal neurological disease that leads to death within 2–5 years of diagnosis for more than 80% of people living with ALS (PLWALS). The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) developed practice parameters—general principles to guide clinicians in managing ALS—encouraging multidisciplinary care (MDC) but does not recommend specific healthcare delivery models. Three healthcare delivery models have evolved: a traditional model, a triage model, and a non-triage model. This study aims to describe preferences for and satisfaction with various models, among PLWALS and their caregivers (CALS), along with their perceptions of how their care aligns with AAN guidelines.

Methods

A cross-sectional observational study utilizing a web-based survey was distributed via email to PLWALS and CALS. Three multi-assessment questionnaires were developed and tailored for PLWALS, CALS, and former CALS. Best-worst scaling (object case) data were analyzed using a best-minus-worst approach and descriptive statistics were calculated from means, t-tests and chi-square.

Results

The combined sample included 378 respondents: 254 PLWALS (67.20%) and 124 CALS (32.80%; composed of 79 current caregivers [20.90%] and 45 former caregivers [11.90%]). The mean respondent age was 61.09 years (SD 11.1). The majority of the sample was white (92.86%), insured by Medicare (61.11%), and married/partnered (79.10%). Respondents preferred a non-triage model the most and a traditional model the least; 88.20% (CI: 84.92–91.49) were extremely likely to choose a non-triage model if given the choice and 83.12% (CI: 79.29–86.92) of respondents ranked non-triage as most preferred. A traditional model was ranked as the least preferred model in 75.28% (CI: 70.78–79.78) of respondents. The most important factors driving respondent preferences were ALS expertise and team-based care. Overall, respondents are satisfied with their care teams. PLWALS utilizing non-triage MDC models reported more adherence to quality care measures compared with those utilizing triage and traditional models.

Discussion

Respondent preference for non-triage models is consistent with the importance they place on the features of non-triage models. However, these findings should be understood in the context of our sample in which a large majority of respondents were receiving care via a non-triage model. To ensure ALS care delivery is patient-centered, practice parameters that aim to guide clinicians in managing ALS should provide more guidance to MDCs to deliver care aligned with patient preferences and values. Efforts should focus on sustainable financial models that can better facilitate non-triage models of care.