错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Assessment of Bone Mineral Density Over 1 Year in a Cross-Sectional Cohort of Migraine Patients Receiving Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies

  • Davide Para,
  • Chiara Camponovo,
  • Gianna Carla Riccitelli,
  • Giulia Mallucci,
  • Paolo Maino,
  • Camilla Mondini Trissino da Lodi,
  • Demurtas Saudina,
  • Pierpaolo Trimboli,
  • Claudio Gobbi,
  • Chiara Zecca

摘要

Background

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), implicated in migraine pain, also possesses bone anabolic properties, which leads to the possibility that monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP (anti-CGRPs) might increase the risk of bone density abnormalities.

Objective

The objective of this study was to explore bone mineral density abnormalities in a cohort of migraine patients treated with anti-CGRPs.

Methods

This was a single-center, cross-sectional, cohort study including migraine patients who underwent a densitometry assessment during anti-CGRP treatment. We assessed the frequency of osteopenia or osteoporosis (OSTEO+ status), defined as a bone mineral density T-score of −1 to −2.5, and <−2.5 standard deviations from the young female adult mean, respectively. Additionally, the association of OSTEO+ status with anti-CGRP treatment duration and primary osteoporosis’ risk factors was investigated using logistic regression models.

Results

Data from 51 patients (43 female, mean age 46 ± 13.9 years) were evaluated. The mean duration of anti-CGRP treatment was 15.7 (±11.8) months. Twenty-seven patients (53%) were OSTEO+ (n = 22 osteopenia; n = 5 osteoporosis). In the final model, menopause [odds ratio 11.641 (95% confidence interval 1.486–91.197), p = 0.019] and anti-seizure drug use [odds ratio 12.825 (95% confidence interval 1.162–141.569), p = 0.037] were associated with OSTEO+ status.

Conclusions

In our cohort of migraine patients, no evidence of an association between anti-CGRP treatment duration and an increasing risk of bone mineral density abnormalities was found. However, these findings are preliminary and necessitate further longitudinal research with larger cohorts and extended follow-up to be validated.