错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of OATP1B Substrates with a Nonlinear Mixed Effect Approach: Estimating Empirical In Vitro-to-In Vivo Scaling Factors

  • Rui Li,
  • Emi Kimoto,
  • Yi-An Bi,
  • David Tess,
  • Manthena V. S. Varma

摘要

Background and Objective

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models are valuable for translating in vitro absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) data to predict clinical pharmacokinetics, and can enable discovery and early clinical stages of pharmaceutical research. However, in predicting pharmacokinetics of organic anion transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B substrates based on in vitro transport and metabolism data, PBPK models typically require additional empirical in vitro-to-in vivo scaling factors (ESFs) in order to accurately recapitulate observed clinical profiles. As model simulation is very sensitive to ESFs, a critical evaluation of ESF estimation is prudent. Previously studies have applied classic ‘two-stage’ and ‘naïve pooled data’ approaches in identifying a set of compound independent ESFs. However, the ‘two-stage’ approach has the parameter identification issue in separately fitting data for individual compounds, while the ‘naïve pooled data’ approach ignores interstudy variability, leading to potentially biased ESF estimates.

Methods

In this study, we have applied a nonlinear mixed-effect approach in estimating ESF of the PBPK model and incorporated additional data from 86 runs of in vitro uptake assay and 49 clinical studies of 12 training compounds in model development to further enhance the translation of in vitro data to predict the pharmacokinetics of OATP1B substrate drugs. To test predication accuracy of the model, a ‘leave-one-out’ analysis has been performed.

Results

The established model can reasonably describe the clinical observations, with both mean values and interstudy variabilities quantified for ESF and volume of distribution parameters. The mean estimates are largely consistent with values in the previous reports. The interstudy variabilities of these parameters are estimated to be at least 50% (as coefficient of variation). Most compounds can be reasonably predicted in the ‘leave-one-out’ analysis.

Conclusion

This study improves the confidence in predicting the pharmacokinetics of OATP1B substrates in individual studies of small sample sizes, and quantifies the variability associated with the prediction.