错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Antibiotics Removal during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Septic Shock Patients: Mixed Modality Versus “Expanded Haemodialysis”

  • Fiorenza Ferrari,
  • Paola Milla,
  • Marco Sartori,
  • Christian Zanza,
  • Manfredi Tesauro,
  • Yaroslava Longhitano,
  • Annalisa De Silvestri,
  • Chiara Abbruzzese,
  • Silvia De Rosa,
  • Sergio Lassola,
  • Sara Samoni,
  • Alessandra Brendolan,
  • Monica Zanella,
  • Vittorio Scaravilli,
  • Giacomo Grasselli,
  • Silvia Arpicco,
  • Claudio Ronco

摘要

Background and Objective

Renal replacement therapy (RRT) plays a critical role in antimicrobial removal, particularly for low-molecular-weight drugs with low plasma protein binding, low distribution volume and hydrophilicity. Medium cut-off (MCO) membranes represent a new generation in dialysis technology, enhancing diffusive modality efficacy and increasing the cut-off from 30 to 45 kDa, crucial for middle molecule removal.

This monocentric randomized crossover pilot study aimed to evaluate the impact of continuous haemodialysis with MCO membrane (MCO-CVVHD) on the removal of piperacillin, tazobactam and meropenem compared with continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration with standard high-flux membrane (HFM-CVVHDF).

Methods

Twenty patients were randomized to undergo MCO-CVVHD followed by HFM-CVVHDF or vice versa. Extraction ratio (ER), effluent clearance (Cleff) and treatment efficiency were assessed at various intervals. Antibiotic nadir plasma levels were measured for both treatment days.

Results

HFM-CVVHDF showed greater ER compared with MCO-CVVHD for meropenem (β = − 8.90 (95% CI − 12.9 to − 4.87), p < 0.001) and tazobactam (β = − 8.29 (95% CI − 13.5 to − 3.08), p = 0.002) and Cleff for each antibiotic (meropenem β = − 10,206 (95% CI − 14,787 to − 5787), p = 0.001); tazobactam (β = − 4551 (95% CI − 7781 to − 1322), p = 0.012); piperacillin (β = − 3913 (95% CI − 6388 to − 1437), p = 0.002), even if the carryover effect influenced the Cleff for meropenem and tazobactam. No difference was observed in nadir plasma concentrations or efficiency for any antibiotic. Piperacillin (β = − 38.1 (95% CI − 47.9 to − 28.3), p < 0.001) and tazobactam (β = − 4.45 (95% CI − 6.17 to − 2.72), p < 0.001) showed lower nadir plasma concentrations the second day compared with the first day, regardless the filter type.

Conclusion

MCO demonstrated comparable in vivo removal of piperacillin, tazobactam and meropenem to HFM.