Scholarlink

Introduction <p>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition with significant psychological and physiological burdens, including diabetes distress and poor glycemic control. Interpersonal Therapy (IPT) addresses interpersonal challenges that may exacerbate distress and hinder self-management. This study evaluates IPT’s efficacy in reducing diabetes distress, enhancing self-efficacy, and improving glycemic control in adults with T2DM compared to standard care.</p> Methods <p>This randomized controlled trial enrolled 136 adults with T2DM, randomized 1:1 to receive either 12 weekly 60-minute IPT sessions or four biweekly 90-minute standard diabetes education sessions. IPT focused on role transitions, interpersonal disputes, grief, and deficits, delivered in small groups by trained psychologists. The control group received education on diet, exercise, and medication adherence. Outcomes, assessed at baseline, post-intervention (12 weeks), and 2-month follow-up, included Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (DMSES), and laboratory markers (HbA1c, fasting blood glucose [FBG], lipids). Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, with <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05 indicating significance.</p> Results <p>Of 136 participants, 128 completed the study (IPT: <i>n</i> = 63; control: <i>n</i> = 65). Baseline characteristics were comparable (mean age: 52.4 ± 8.7 years IPT; 53.1 ± 9.2 years control). IPT significantly reduced DDS scores post-intervention (<i>p</i> = 0.02, Cohen’s d = 0.48) and at follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.57) compared to control. Self-efficacy (DMSES) improved more in IPT post-intervention (<i>p</i> = 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.71), though differences were non-significant at follow-up (<i>p</i> = 0.09). IPT showed greater improvements in HbA1c (<i>p</i> = 0.01 post-intervention, Cohen’s d = 0.44; <i>p</i> = 0.02 follow-up, Cohen’s d = 0.47), FBG (<i>p</i> = 0.03 post-intervention, Cohen’s d = 0.46; <i>p</i> = 0.02 follow-up, Cohen’s d = 0.50), and HDL (<i>p</i> = 0.02 post-intervention, Cohen’s d = 0.43; <i>p</i> = 0.01 follow-up, Cohen’s d = 0.47). Control group improved in total cholesterol (<i>p</i> = 0.03) and triglycerides (<i>p</i> = 0.04). No significant between-group differences were found for LDL.</p> Conclusion <p>IPT significantly reduced diabetes distress, enhanced self-efficacy, and improved HbA1c, FBG, and HDL compared to standard education in T2DM patients. Standard education improved lipid profiles, suggesting complementary benefits. Integrating IPT into diabetes care could enhance psychological and metabolic outcomes.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effect of interpersonal therapy on distress, self-efficacy, lipid profile and glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月27日

查看全文
  • Mahdi Nasiri Ardali,
  • Mohammadamin Jandaghian-Bidgoli,
  • Seyedeh Narjes Mousavizadeh

摘要

Introduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic condition with significant psychological and physiological burdens, including diabetes distress and poor glycemic control. Interpersonal Therapy (IPT) addresses interpersonal challenges that may exacerbate distress and hinder self-management. This study evaluates IPT’s efficacy in reducing diabetes distress, enhancing self-efficacy, and improving glycemic control in adults with T2DM compared to standard care.

Methods

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 136 adults with T2DM, randomized 1:1 to receive either 12 weekly 60-minute IPT sessions or four biweekly 90-minute standard diabetes education sessions. IPT focused on role transitions, interpersonal disputes, grief, and deficits, delivered in small groups by trained psychologists. The control group received education on diet, exercise, and medication adherence. Outcomes, assessed at baseline, post-intervention (12 weeks), and 2-month follow-up, included Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS), Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (DMSES), and laboratory markers (HbA1c, fasting blood glucose [FBG], lipids). Data were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, with p < 0.05 indicating significance.

Results

Of 136 participants, 128 completed the study (IPT: n = 63; control: n = 65). Baseline characteristics were comparable (mean age: 52.4 ± 8.7 years IPT; 53.1 ± 9.2 years control). IPT significantly reduced DDS scores post-intervention (p = 0.02, Cohen’s d = 0.48) and at follow-up (p = 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.57) compared to control. Self-efficacy (DMSES) improved more in IPT post-intervention (p = 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.71), though differences were non-significant at follow-up (p = 0.09). IPT showed greater improvements in HbA1c (p = 0.01 post-intervention, Cohen’s d = 0.44; p = 0.02 follow-up, Cohen’s d = 0.47), FBG (p = 0.03 post-intervention, Cohen’s d = 0.46; p = 0.02 follow-up, Cohen’s d = 0.50), and HDL (p = 0.02 post-intervention, Cohen’s d = 0.43; p = 0.01 follow-up, Cohen’s d = 0.47). Control group improved in total cholesterol (p = 0.03) and triglycerides (p = 0.04). No significant between-group differences were found for LDL.

Conclusion

IPT significantly reduced diabetes distress, enhanced self-efficacy, and improved HbA1c, FBG, and HDL compared to standard education in T2DM patients. Standard education improved lipid profiles, suggesting complementary benefits. Integrating IPT into diabetes care could enhance psychological and metabolic outcomes.