Purpose of Review <p>Increased politicization of health care, exemplified by bans on gender-affirming and reproductive care, has significantly impacted adolescents’ ability to receive safe care. We conducted a rapid review of evidence examining politicized health legislation’s impact on adolescents’ right to health, focusing on reproductive, gender-affirming, and eating disorder care.</p> Recent Findings <p>Politicization of care has impacted adolescents’ right to health by creating financial barriers and changes in geographic access. For example, state legislative ban on abortion and gender-affirming care have created care deserts in which adolescents are forced to travel to receive care. These changes have resulted in delays in care, loss of bodily autonomy, and negative impacts on physical and mental health.</p> Summary <p>The findings of this rapid review have important implications for adolescent medicine clinical practices. Providers caring for adolescents require institutional support and resources to address increased patient psychosocial concerns and potentially higher patient volume as a result of restrictive legislation. Ultimately, policy advocacy is necessary to change legislation disrupting adolescents’ right to health.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The Impact of Politicization on Adolescent Medicine Care: A Rapid Review

  • Laura Stamm,
  • Breanna De Leon,
  • Da’Jon M. Stoudemire,
  • Milena E. Insalaco,
  • Ahona Shirin,
  • Madalayne Martin-Olenski,
  • Carley Daley,
  • Kristefer Stojanovski

摘要

Purpose of Review

Increased politicization of health care, exemplified by bans on gender-affirming and reproductive care, has significantly impacted adolescents’ ability to receive safe care. We conducted a rapid review of evidence examining politicized health legislation’s impact on adolescents’ right to health, focusing on reproductive, gender-affirming, and eating disorder care.

Recent Findings

Politicization of care has impacted adolescents’ right to health by creating financial barriers and changes in geographic access. For example, state legislative ban on abortion and gender-affirming care have created care deserts in which adolescents are forced to travel to receive care. These changes have resulted in delays in care, loss of bodily autonomy, and negative impacts on physical and mental health.

Summary

The findings of this rapid review have important implications for adolescent medicine clinical practices. Providers caring for adolescents require institutional support and resources to address increased patient psychosocial concerns and potentially higher patient volume as a result of restrictive legislation. Ultimately, policy advocacy is necessary to change legislation disrupting adolescents’ right to health.