Introduction <p>The 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV21) covers 83–88% of IPD in US adults but does not include serotype 4 (ST4), which is covered by previously recommended vaccines (PPSV23, PCV15, PCV20). Recent increases in IPD cases due to ST4 have been observed, particularly among adults under 65, including Native American/Alaskan Native and those with social risk factors. As a result, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends ST4-containing vaccines (PPSV23, PCV15, and PCV20) for populations with ≥ 30% ST4 IPD cases. In this study, we aimed to analyze ST4 attributable fraction (AF) thresholds for health and economic outcomes of PCV21 versus PCV20 vaccination in US adults aged 19–49 and 50–64 years with underlying medical conditions.</p> Methods <p>We used a validated Markov model to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for PCV21 versus PCV20 and identified ST4 AF thresholds in which the ICER shifted from ‘cost-saving’ to ‘not cost-effective’. The analysis involved a hypothetical 1 million at-risk adults aged 19–49 and 50–64&#xa0;years.</p> Results <p>PCV21 remained cost-saving compared to PCV20 when ST4 accounted for ≤ 27% (age 19–49) or ≤ 36% (age 50–64) of IPD. When ST4 increases were&#xa0;applied to both IPD and NBPP, these thresholds decreased to ≤ 21% and ≤ 28%, respectively.</p> Conclusion <p>For populations experiencing moderate increases in the proportion of ST4 (i.e., &lt; 30%), PCV21 may offer health and economic benefits over PCV20 for US adults aged 19–64&#xa0;years with underlying medical conditions. However, in populations with ≥ 30% ST4, ST4-containing vaccines should be used as per ACIP guidance.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Economic Evaluation of PCV21 Use in Populations with Increasing Serotype 4 Invasive Pneumococcal Disease in the US: An Attributable Fraction Threshold Analysis

  • Zinan Yi,
  • Kwame Owusu-Edusei,
  • Elmira Flem,
  • Kristen Feemster,
  • Elamin H. Elbasha

摘要

Introduction

The 21-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV21) covers 83–88% of IPD in US adults but does not include serotype 4 (ST4), which is covered by previously recommended vaccines (PPSV23, PCV15, PCV20). Recent increases in IPD cases due to ST4 have been observed, particularly among adults under 65, including Native American/Alaskan Native and those with social risk factors. As a result, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommends ST4-containing vaccines (PPSV23, PCV15, and PCV20) for populations with ≥ 30% ST4 IPD cases. In this study, we aimed to analyze ST4 attributable fraction (AF) thresholds for health and economic outcomes of PCV21 versus PCV20 vaccination in US adults aged 19–49 and 50–64 years with underlying medical conditions.

Methods

We used a validated Markov model to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for PCV21 versus PCV20 and identified ST4 AF thresholds in which the ICER shifted from ‘cost-saving’ to ‘not cost-effective’. The analysis involved a hypothetical 1 million at-risk adults aged 19–49 and 50–64 years.

Results

PCV21 remained cost-saving compared to PCV20 when ST4 accounted for ≤ 27% (age 19–49) or ≤ 36% (age 50–64) of IPD. When ST4 increases were applied to both IPD and NBPP, these thresholds decreased to ≤ 21% and ≤ 28%, respectively.

Conclusion

For populations experiencing moderate increases in the proportion of ST4 (i.e., < 30%), PCV21 may offer health and economic benefits over PCV20 for US adults aged 19–64 years with underlying medical conditions. However, in populations with ≥ 30% ST4, ST4-containing vaccines should be used as per ACIP guidance.