Scholarlink

<p>IoT-based healthcare networks are highly susceptible to cyberattacks because of the numerous sensors placed in an unprotected network. These could result in attacks that are hard to control and keep an eye on. A novel lightweight authentication protocol (NLAP) has been proposed in our previous work for instantaneous intelligent health services. Confidentiality, integrity, validation, and access control are the four security standards that must be satisfied. This study’s primary focus is user and sensor equipment authentication. This study uses AVISPA SPAN to validate the lightweight authentication protocol, which has been broadly described. The results of the study show that our recommended system is safe to use for any confidential transmission and also resilient to several types of security breaches. In particular, we contrast the NLAP with related protocols on the basis of computational cost, computational efficiency, and necessary security. The results show that our protocol performs better than the other protocols and the graphical approach of comparative analysis has been shown.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

The Authorization of a Communication Cost Bit-based Authentication Protocol and its Execution Time for the Security of the Healthcare Monitoring System

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月10日

查看全文
  • Kiran Dewangan,
  • Arun Kumar,
  • Naveen Kumar Dewangan,
  • Prasanna P. Deshpande,
  • Amar Kumar Dey

摘要

IoT-based healthcare networks are highly susceptible to cyberattacks because of the numerous sensors placed in an unprotected network. These could result in attacks that are hard to control and keep an eye on. A novel lightweight authentication protocol (NLAP) has been proposed in our previous work for instantaneous intelligent health services. Confidentiality, integrity, validation, and access control are the four security standards that must be satisfied. This study’s primary focus is user and sensor equipment authentication. This study uses AVISPA SPAN to validate the lightweight authentication protocol, which has been broadly described. The results of the study show that our recommended system is safe to use for any confidential transmission and also resilient to several types of security breaches. In particular, we contrast the NLAP with related protocols on the basis of computational cost, computational efficiency, and necessary security. The results show that our protocol performs better than the other protocols and the graphical approach of comparative analysis has been shown.