Scholarlink

<p>Manual transplanted rice is labor-intensive, requires a large amount of water, and makes soil poor. Keeping this in view, Non-puddled machine transplanted rice (NPMTR) as an alternative planting technique for puddled machine transplanted rice (PMTR) was tested at Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute (TRRI), Aduthurai during <i>Kharif</i> seasons 2016 to 2020. The experimental data was analyzed using an independent two-sample t-test. The statistical analysis results indicated that NPMTR and PMTR rice planting techniques did not show any significant difference in rice grain yields and recorded 4.82 and 5.06 t/ha respectively. However, a significant (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.00) higher water use efficiency (4.852&#xa0;kg/ ha mm) was observed under NPMTR, saving approximately 21% water with a 4.97% yield penalty compared to PMTR. In addition, economic analysis results also indicated a higher benefit-cost ratio (B: C Ratio) of 2.29 under NPMTR than 2.09 in PMTR. NPMTR is cost-effective (less production cost ₹ 5880/ha), resource-saving (fuel 26&#xa0;L/ ha, energy (1220&#xa0;MJ/ ha), time (5.5&#xa0;h/ ha) and water (250.4&#xa0;mm/ ha), easy to practice and reliable rice transplanting method under fast-changing global climatic conditions.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Performance of Non-Puddled Machine Transplanted Rice over Puddled Machine Transplanted Rice in Thanjavur District of Tamil Nadu

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年2月18日

查看全文
  • S. Elamathi,
  • K. Subrahmaniyan,
  • M. Raju,
  • C. Umamaheswari,
  • P. Anandhi

摘要

Manual transplanted rice is labor-intensive, requires a large amount of water, and makes soil poor. Keeping this in view, Non-puddled machine transplanted rice (NPMTR) as an alternative planting technique for puddled machine transplanted rice (PMTR) was tested at Tamil Nadu Rice Research Institute (TRRI), Aduthurai during Kharif seasons 2016 to 2020. The experimental data was analyzed using an independent two-sample t-test. The statistical analysis results indicated that NPMTR and PMTR rice planting techniques did not show any significant difference in rice grain yields and recorded 4.82 and 5.06 t/ha respectively. However, a significant (P < 0.00) higher water use efficiency (4.852 kg/ ha mm) was observed under NPMTR, saving approximately 21% water with a 4.97% yield penalty compared to PMTR. In addition, economic analysis results also indicated a higher benefit-cost ratio (B: C Ratio) of 2.29 under NPMTR than 2.09 in PMTR. NPMTR is cost-effective (less production cost ₹ 5880/ha), resource-saving (fuel 26 L/ ha, energy (1220 MJ/ ha), time (5.5 h/ ha) and water (250.4 mm/ ha), easy to practice and reliable rice transplanting method under fast-changing global climatic conditions.