Werden soziale Teilhabe und weitere inklusive Bildungsziele besser an verschiedenen Formen von Ganztagsschulen erreicht als an Halbtagsschulen?
摘要
Due to the extended time frame, all-day schools have more opportunities to promote inclusive educational goals in everyday school life than half-day schools. However, there is little empirical evidence on whether different types of all-day schools are better at achieving inclusive educational goals than half-day schools. The article examines whether pupils at half-day schools and open, partially and fully bound all-day schools differ in their self-assessment of their social participation, democratic education, support for their personality development and their empowerment. The analyses based on the INSIDE-study with N = 1097 seventh-graders at inclusive schools show that attending an all-day school does not provide a general advantage for achieving inclusive educational goals and that perceptions hardly differ between the organizational forms of school. Only personality development is rated slightly higher at partially bound all-day schools than at half-day schools. The results can be integrated in the general debate about the effectiveness of all-day schools.