<p>Climate-resilient crop varieties are exceedingly important for global food security. High-accuracy predictions of crop phenology in future climate scenarios require a more precise description of putative crop-environment interactions. While the accuracy of these predictions is affected by three primary sources of uncertainty — the phenology model, the climate scenario data, and their interaction — commonly used approaches consider only the phenology model as a source of uncertainty, while uncertainties arising from climate scenario data and their interaction with the model are commonly neglected. To address this gap, we developed a novel dynamic crop phenology model framework that simultaneously integrates uncertainties arising from all three sources. This model framework was developed using a large dataset of winter wheat phenology ratings and environmental covariate observations, encompassing more than 2500 locations spanning more than 80 years. It incorporates and combines up to seven environmental covariates in an additive manner, resulting in a large set of possible models from which to select. For each model, the phenological development follows a defined response curve per environmental covariate. Using climate scenario projections in Switzerland, our proposed effective model selection process helps to find the best model that reduces uncertainties in predicting future crop phenology. In addition to predictions, the model can pinpoint the driving environmental covariates for different phenological phases. Four major phenological stages are predicted for an independent subset of the large dataset and future climate scenario projections. Predictions for future climate scenario projections indicate a 22-day earlier heading for 2070–2099 compared to the reference period (1981–2010). Ignoring uncertainties arising from climate data results in contradictory predictions. These findings underscore the importance of considering all three uncertainty sources — phenology model, climate scenario data, and their interaction — in accurately predicting phenology under future climates.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A conceptual framework for simultaneous optimization of integrated climate scenario data and phenology models

  • Flavian Tschurr,
  • Sven Kotlarski,
  • Pierre Martre,
  • Achim Walter,
  • Lukas Roth

摘要

Climate-resilient crop varieties are exceedingly important for global food security. High-accuracy predictions of crop phenology in future climate scenarios require a more precise description of putative crop-environment interactions. While the accuracy of these predictions is affected by three primary sources of uncertainty — the phenology model, the climate scenario data, and their interaction — commonly used approaches consider only the phenology model as a source of uncertainty, while uncertainties arising from climate scenario data and their interaction with the model are commonly neglected. To address this gap, we developed a novel dynamic crop phenology model framework that simultaneously integrates uncertainties arising from all three sources. This model framework was developed using a large dataset of winter wheat phenology ratings and environmental covariate observations, encompassing more than 2500 locations spanning more than 80 years. It incorporates and combines up to seven environmental covariates in an additive manner, resulting in a large set of possible models from which to select. For each model, the phenological development follows a defined response curve per environmental covariate. Using climate scenario projections in Switzerland, our proposed effective model selection process helps to find the best model that reduces uncertainties in predicting future crop phenology. In addition to predictions, the model can pinpoint the driving environmental covariates for different phenological phases. Four major phenological stages are predicted for an independent subset of the large dataset and future climate scenario projections. Predictions for future climate scenario projections indicate a 22-day earlier heading for 2070–2099 compared to the reference period (1981–2010). Ignoring uncertainties arising from climate data results in contradictory predictions. These findings underscore the importance of considering all three uncertainty sources — phenology model, climate scenario data, and their interaction — in accurately predicting phenology under future climates.