Introduction <p>Tildrakizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin (IL)-23 approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis across two different dosages (100&#xa0;mg and 200&#xa0;mg). The higher dosage is recommended for patients with a body weight ≥ 90&#xa0;kg or a high disease burden (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] ≥ 16 or the involvement of difficult-to-treat areas). We conducted a 52-week multicenter retrospective study to compare the effectiveness and safety of both dosages and assess their impact on specific patient subgroups.</p> Methods <p>We enrolled a total of 540 patients with high disease burden or body weight ≥ 90&#xa0;kg; 177 and 363 were treated with tildrakizumab 200&#xa0;mg and 100&#xa0;mg, respectively. The effectiveness was evaluated in terms of PASI 90, PASI 100, and PASI ≤ 2 at weeks&#xa0;16, 28, and 52. We also performed subanalyses according to the body weight (≥ 90&#xa0;kg), PASI ≥ 16, prior biologic exposure, involvement of difficult-to-treat areas, and the presence of at least one cardiometabolic comorbidity.</p> Results <p>After 16&#xa0;weeks of treatment, a higher proportion of patients in the 200-mg group achieved PASI 90 and PASI 100 compared to those in the 100-mg group (43.5% vs. 34.3% and 36.4% vs. 24.2%, respectively). These results were sustained at 1 year, with PASI 90 and PASI 100 reached by 68.6% and 52.9% of patients in the 200-mg group, respectively, versus 57.3% and 35% in the 100-mg group. All subgroup analyses consistently indicated a trend toward greater effectiveness with tildrakizumab 200&#xa0;mg, particularly in terms of PASI 90 and PASI 100 achievement at weeks&#xa0;16 and 52. No differences in the safety profile were observed throughout the study period.</p> Conclusion <p>Our findings confirm the superior effectiveness of tildrakizumab 200&#xa0;mg over 100&#xa0;mg in specific subgroups of patients with a comparable safety profile across the study period.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Optimizing Tildrakizumab Dosing in Psoriasis: A 52-Week Multicenter Retrospective Study Comparing 100 mg and 200 mg—IL PSO (Italian Landscape Psoriasis)

  • Mario Valenti,
  • Luciano Ibba,
  • Sara Di Giulio,
  • Luigi Gargiulo,
  • Piergiorgio Malagoli,
  • Anna Balato,
  • Federico Bardazzi,
  • Francesco Loconsole,
  • Martina Burlando,
  • Anna E. Cagni,
  • Norma Cameli,
  • Carlo G. Carrera,
  • Andrea Carugno,
  • Aldo Cuccia,
  • Paolo Dapavo,
  • Eugenia V. Di Brizzi,
  • Valentina Dini,
  • Maria C. Fargnoli,
  • Francesca M. Gaiani,
  • Claudio Guarneri,
  • Claudia Lasagni,
  • Gaetano Licata,
  • Angelo V. Marzano,
  • Matteo Megna,
  • Santo R. Mercuri,
  • Alessandra Michelucci,
  • Maria L. Musumeci,
  • Diego Orsini,
  • Romina Ortega,
  • Luca Potestio,
  • Luca Rapparini,
  • Simone Ribero,
  • Francesca Satolli,
  • Davide Strippoli,
  • Emanuele Trovato,
  • Marina Venturini,
  • Leonardo Zichichi,
  • Pina Brianti,
  • Antonio Costanzo,
  • Alessandra Narcisi

摘要

Introduction

Tildrakizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting interleukin (IL)-23 approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis across two different dosages (100 mg and 200 mg). The higher dosage is recommended for patients with a body weight ≥ 90 kg or a high disease burden (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] ≥ 16 or the involvement of difficult-to-treat areas). We conducted a 52-week multicenter retrospective study to compare the effectiveness and safety of both dosages and assess their impact on specific patient subgroups.

Methods

We enrolled a total of 540 patients with high disease burden or body weight ≥ 90 kg; 177 and 363 were treated with tildrakizumab 200 mg and 100 mg, respectively. The effectiveness was evaluated in terms of PASI 90, PASI 100, and PASI ≤ 2 at weeks 16, 28, and 52. We also performed subanalyses according to the body weight (≥ 90 kg), PASI ≥ 16, prior biologic exposure, involvement of difficult-to-treat areas, and the presence of at least one cardiometabolic comorbidity.

Results

After 16 weeks of treatment, a higher proportion of patients in the 200-mg group achieved PASI 90 and PASI 100 compared to those in the 100-mg group (43.5% vs. 34.3% and 36.4% vs. 24.2%, respectively). These results were sustained at 1 year, with PASI 90 and PASI 100 reached by 68.6% and 52.9% of patients in the 200-mg group, respectively, versus 57.3% and 35% in the 100-mg group. All subgroup analyses consistently indicated a trend toward greater effectiveness with tildrakizumab 200 mg, particularly in terms of PASI 90 and PASI 100 achievement at weeks 16 and 52. No differences in the safety profile were observed throughout the study period.

Conclusion

Our findings confirm the superior effectiveness of tildrakizumab 200 mg over 100 mg in specific subgroups of patients with a comparable safety profile across the study period.