Scholarlink

<p>In traditional life insurance, typically return smoothing mechanisms are used to reduce the volatility of policyholders’ returns and provide risk sharing between policyholders. By analyzing two illustrative smoothing mechanisms, we demonstrate that different smoothing mechanisms may have different effects. We find that mechanisms that are purely based on average historical asset returns can significantly reduce pathwise volatility (intertemporal smoothing) but have hardly any impact on the standard deviation of terminal wealth. In contrast, mechanisms using buffers that are built up “in good years” in order to increase returns “in bad years” can—when properly designed—reduce the standard deviation of terminal wealth without reducing the ex ante expected return by means of intergenerational risk sharing.</p><p>We conclude that simple generic mechanisms that are often used in academic papers may not fully cover the effects resulting from return smoothing. Our results indicate that—when properly designed—intergenerational risk sharing mechanisms can improve risk-return profiles but at the price of increased complexity and potentially lower surrender values. A strong regulatory focus on simple products and sufficiently high surrender values might disincentivize products with intergenerational risk sharing despite their positive effects.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

From intertemporal smoothing to intergenerational risk sharing: The effects of different return smoothing mechanisms in life insurance

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月4日

查看全文
  • Alexander Kling,
  • Timon Kramer,
  • Jochen Ruß

摘要

In traditional life insurance, typically return smoothing mechanisms are used to reduce the volatility of policyholders’ returns and provide risk sharing between policyholders. By analyzing two illustrative smoothing mechanisms, we demonstrate that different smoothing mechanisms may have different effects. We find that mechanisms that are purely based on average historical asset returns can significantly reduce pathwise volatility (intertemporal smoothing) but have hardly any impact on the standard deviation of terminal wealth. In contrast, mechanisms using buffers that are built up “in good years” in order to increase returns “in bad years” can—when properly designed—reduce the standard deviation of terminal wealth without reducing the ex ante expected return by means of intergenerational risk sharing.

We conclude that simple generic mechanisms that are often used in academic papers may not fully cover the effects resulting from return smoothing. Our results indicate that—when properly designed—intergenerational risk sharing mechanisms can improve risk-return profiles but at the price of increased complexity and potentially lower surrender values. A strong regulatory focus on simple products and sufficiently high surrender values might disincentivize products with intergenerational risk sharing despite their positive effects.