Scholarlink

<p>Metcalf (2026) provides a productive commentary on our paper, ‘Is Undisclosed LLM Use Morally Wrong?’ (Sahebi &amp; Montefiore, 2026). Metcalf characterises our view - the Faked-Competencies account - and argues that it fails to necessarily or sufficiently explain what is wrong about undisclosed LLM use. In its place, Metcalf endorses a pluralism of explanations involving, in addition to the Faked-Competencies Account, deceptions over care, and deceptions over one’s identity. In this commentary, we endorse these additions and welcome a pluralism of explanations in capturing the wrongness of undisclosed LLM use. We also note a few points of difference between Metcalf’s analysis of this debate and how we understand it.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Just How Wrong is Undisclosed LLM Use? Reply to Metcalf (2026)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月30日

查看全文
  • Thomas Montefiore,
  • Siavosh Sahebi

摘要

Metcalf (2026) provides a productive commentary on our paper, ‘Is Undisclosed LLM Use Morally Wrong?’ (Sahebi & Montefiore, 2026). Metcalf characterises our view - the Faked-Competencies account - and argues that it fails to necessarily or sufficiently explain what is wrong about undisclosed LLM use. In its place, Metcalf endorses a pluralism of explanations involving, in addition to the Faked-Competencies Account, deceptions over care, and deceptions over one’s identity. In this commentary, we endorse these additions and welcome a pluralism of explanations in capturing the wrongness of undisclosed LLM use. We also note a few points of difference between Metcalf’s analysis of this debate and how we understand it.