Scholarlink

<p>This is a response to “Bridging Divides and Building Resilience: a Reply to Bridging the Divide: Using LLMs to Reshape Difficult Disagreements” by ÓhÉigeartaigh and Corsi. While I agree that LLM-based tools for navigating disagreement must be situated within a broader project of epistemic resilience, I clarify that the original proposal should not be understood merely as private rehearsal or as an individualized solution to a structural problem. I argue that low-risk epistemic spaces are best understood as local forms of epistemic care that respond to vulnerabilities produced by systemic conditions of disagreement.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Caring for Disagreement: Response to ÓhÉigeartaigh and Corsi

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月30日

查看全文
  • Matthew Willis

摘要

This is a response to “Bridging Divides and Building Resilience: a Reply to Bridging the Divide: Using LLMs to Reshape Difficult Disagreements” by ÓhÉigeartaigh and Corsi. While I agree that LLM-based tools for navigating disagreement must be situated within a broader project of epistemic resilience, I clarify that the original proposal should not be understood merely as private rehearsal or as an individualized solution to a structural problem. I argue that low-risk epistemic spaces are best understood as local forms of epistemic care that respond to vulnerabilities produced by systemic conditions of disagreement.