Scholarlink

<p>In this response to Simon Mills’ ‘General Technology, Judgement, and the Optative: Constructing the Technological Transcendental in Gilbert Simondon’, we engage with and contribute to the recent scholarship on transcendental perspectives in philosophy of technology. Reading Simondon alongside Stiegler, we argue that Stiegler’s atranscendental philosophy is often dismissed by a universalizing tendency that risks dogmatism. Drawing on Bataille’s general economy and Stiegler’s general organology, we propose a politicized, non-dogmatic approach to 'general technology' that attends to multiple worlds and transcendentals. We caution against solutionism and the fetishization of technical judgement, advocating instead for a pharmacology of liminal spaces that cultivates sensibility, openness, and the future of philosophy itself.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

General Technology for a Multitude of Worlds: Towards a Non-dogmatic Philosophy of Technology

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月14日

查看全文
  • Anaïs Nony,
  • Benoit Dillet

摘要

In this response to Simon Mills’ ‘General Technology, Judgement, and the Optative: Constructing the Technological Transcendental in Gilbert Simondon’, we engage with and contribute to the recent scholarship on transcendental perspectives in philosophy of technology. Reading Simondon alongside Stiegler, we argue that Stiegler’s atranscendental philosophy is often dismissed by a universalizing tendency that risks dogmatism. Drawing on Bataille’s general economy and Stiegler’s general organology, we propose a politicized, non-dogmatic approach to 'general technology' that attends to multiple worlds and transcendentals. We caution against solutionism and the fetishization of technical judgement, advocating instead for a pharmacology of liminal spaces that cultivates sensibility, openness, and the future of philosophy itself.