Scholarlink

<p>In our article “The Potential and Limitations of Artificial Colleagues”, we argue that policy makers and industry leaders ought to prioritise human collegial relationships over relationships with artificial colleagues. We call this the <i>Principle of Strict Priority of Human Collegial Relationships (PSP)</i>. Nicholas Carroll offers an intriguing critique of PSP, claiming that it is not a plausible candidate for a governance principle because it is insufficiently action-guiding. Carroll further proposes an amended version of PSP, the <i>Principle of Proportional Priority for Human Collegial Relationships (PPP)</i>. Here, we outline two concerns with this proposal. First, we are not convinced that PSP stands in need of an amendment. Second, we are not convinced that PPP is a compelling candidate for an amendment.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Debating the Priority of Human Collegial Relationships: Response to Carroll

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月25日

查看全文
  • Friedemann Bieber,
  • Charlotte Franziska Unruh

摘要

In our article “The Potential and Limitations of Artificial Colleagues”, we argue that policy makers and industry leaders ought to prioritise human collegial relationships over relationships with artificial colleagues. We call this the Principle of Strict Priority of Human Collegial Relationships (PSP). Nicholas Carroll offers an intriguing critique of PSP, claiming that it is not a plausible candidate for a governance principle because it is insufficiently action-guiding. Carroll further proposes an amended version of PSP, the Principle of Proportional Priority for Human Collegial Relationships (PPP). Here, we outline two concerns with this proposal. First, we are not convinced that PSP stands in need of an amendment. Second, we are not convinced that PPP is a compelling candidate for an amendment.