Scholarlink

<p>Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) reduces the risks associated with splenectomy and can be performed laparoscopically (Lap-SPDP) or robotically (Rob-SPDP). Whether robotic assistance improves spleen preservation compared with laparoscopy remains unclear. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the prospective Italian Registry of Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (IGOMIPS). All consecutive patients scheduled for SPDP between September 2019 and July 2024 were analyzed according to an intention-to-treat protocol. Primary endpoint was intraoperative deviation from planned SPDP; secondary endpoints included intra- and postoperative outcomes. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline variables, with a second propensity score matching including center volume and surgeon experience. Of 3045 procedures, 270 were planned SPDP (Rob-SPDP n = 138, Lap-SPDP n = 132). Overall intraoperative deviation occurred in 22.6% of cases, most commonly conversion to distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy. Spleen-vessel preservation rates were similar for Rob-SPDP (87.9) and Lap-SPDP (90.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.5561). Robotic procedures had longer operative time but lower stapler use. No significant differences were observed in severe complications, mortality, length of stay, or other postoperative outcomes in unmatched or matched cohorts. Robotic use increased significantly over time and was predominant in centers with robotic platforms and higher volumes. In a prospective national registry, Lap-SPDP and Rob-SPDP achieved comparable spleen preservation rates and perioperative outcomes. Robotic assistance did not confer measurable clinical advantages, though its adoption is increasing, particularly in high-volume, well-equipped centers.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Robotics vs. laparoscopy in spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy in the IGOMIPS registry: when glitter does not equal superiority

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月29日

查看全文
  • Niccolò Napoli,
  • Michael Ginesini,
  • Allegra Ripolli,
  • Alessandro Esposito,
  • Massimo Falconi,
  • Giovanni Ferrari,
  • Carlo Molino,
  • Luca Morelli,
  • Roberto Salvia,
  • Alessandro Zerbi,
  • Ugo Boggi,
  • Sergio Alfieri,
  • Fabrizio Aquilino,
  • Gian Luca Baiocchi,
  • Roberto Ballarin,
  • Vittoria Barbieri,
  • Felice Borghi,
  • Alice Borsano,
  • Marco Brizzolari,
  • Alberto Brolese,
  • Giovanni Butturini,
  • Donata Campra,
  • Giovanni Capretti,
  • Damiano Caputo,
  • Riccardo Casadei,
  • Davide Citterio,
  • Annalisa Comandatore,
  • Roberto Coppola,
  • Enrico Crolla,
  • Matteo De Pastena,
  • Giacomo Deiro,
  • Fabrizio Di Benedetto,
  • Gregorio Di Franco,
  • Greta Donsi,
  • Giorgio Ercolani,
  • Giuseppe Maria Ettorre,
  • Valentina Ferraro,
  • Alessandro Ferrero,
  • Marco Garatti,
  • Andrea Gardini,
  • Gianluca Garulli,
  • Gennaro Nappo,
  • Luana Genova,
  • Alessandro Giani,
  • Alessandro Giardino,
  • Marco Giordano,
  • Salvatore Gruttadauria,
  • Claudio Ingaldi,
  • Elio Jovine,
  • Emanuele Federico Kauffmann,
  • Luca Landoni,
  • Serena Langella,
  • Sergio Li Petri,
  • Angela Maffongelli,
  • Alberto Manzoni,
  • Stefano Marcucci,
  • Marco Massani,
  • Laura Mastrangelo,
  • Vincenzo Mazzaferro,
  • Michele Mazzola,
  • Riccardo Memeo,
  • Roberta Menghi,
  • Roberto Luca Meniconi,
  • Luca Moraldi,
  • Francesco Moro,
  • Cristina Nistri,
  • Vincenzo Papagni,
  • Stefano Partelli,
  • Luca Mattia Quarti,
  • Claudio Ricci,
  • Renato Romagnoli,
  • Gianluca Rompianesi,
  • Roberto Ivan Troisi,
  • Luigi Veneroni,
  • Leonardo Vincenti,
  • Massimo Giuseppe Viola,
  • Virginia Viti,
  • Giacomo Zanus

摘要

Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) reduces the risks associated with splenectomy and can be performed laparoscopically (Lap-SPDP) or robotically (Rob-SPDP). Whether robotic assistance improves spleen preservation compared with laparoscopy remains unclear. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the prospective Italian Registry of Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (IGOMIPS). All consecutive patients scheduled for SPDP between September 2019 and July 2024 were analyzed according to an intention-to-treat protocol. Primary endpoint was intraoperative deviation from planned SPDP; secondary endpoints included intra- and postoperative outcomes. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline variables, with a second propensity score matching including center volume and surgeon experience. Of 3045 procedures, 270 were planned SPDP (Rob-SPDP n = 138, Lap-SPDP n = 132). Overall intraoperative deviation occurred in 22.6% of cases, most commonly conversion to distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy. Spleen-vessel preservation rates were similar for Rob-SPDP (87.9) and Lap-SPDP (90.6%; p = 0.5561). Robotic procedures had longer operative time but lower stapler use. No significant differences were observed in severe complications, mortality, length of stay, or other postoperative outcomes in unmatched or matched cohorts. Robotic use increased significantly over time and was predominant in centers with robotic platforms and higher volumes. In a prospective national registry, Lap-SPDP and Rob-SPDP achieved comparable spleen preservation rates and perioperative outcomes. Robotic assistance did not confer measurable clinical advantages, though its adoption is increasing, particularly in high-volume, well-equipped centers.