Scholarlink

<p>Forest disturbances are increasingly understood as social-ecological phenomena involving diverse actors. Here, we focused on one of the Europe’s largest recent disturbances—the drought-triggered bark beetle outbreak in Central Europe (2017–2022). Based on a survey of 165 respondents, we examined perceived disturbance drivers, response actions, and the alignment between them as an indicator of a value-action gap that is often present in social-ecological and governance systems. Climatic and forest structure-related factors were identified as the dominant drivers, aligning with current scientific understanding, whereas socio-economic and management constraints were perceived as less influential. Reported responses reflected awareness of climate-change risks and involved workforce training, adaptive change in species composition, and water-retention measures. Cause–action alignment was observed in nearly half of respondents, particularly among managers and legal entities. We found a relatively sound understanding of disturbance causes and corresponding responses, likely shaped by recent experience with an&#xa0;unprecedented disturbance impact.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Stakeholder perceptions of forest disturbance drivers and management responses are aligned in Central Europe

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月30日

查看全文
  • Michaela Perunová,
  • Roman Modlinger,
  • Vilém Jarský,
  • Tomáš Hlásny

摘要

Forest disturbances are increasingly understood as social-ecological phenomena involving diverse actors. Here, we focused on one of the Europe’s largest recent disturbances—the drought-triggered bark beetle outbreak in Central Europe (2017–2022). Based on a survey of 165 respondents, we examined perceived disturbance drivers, response actions, and the alignment between them as an indicator of a value-action gap that is often present in social-ecological and governance systems. Climatic and forest structure-related factors were identified as the dominant drivers, aligning with current scientific understanding, whereas socio-economic and management constraints were perceived as less influential. Reported responses reflected awareness of climate-change risks and involved workforce training, adaptive change in species composition, and water-retention measures. Cause–action alignment was observed in nearly half of respondents, particularly among managers and legal entities. We found a relatively sound understanding of disturbance causes and corresponding responses, likely shaped by recent experience with an unprecedented disturbance impact.